Francisco Nieves Reyes v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc. et al

Filing 34

Stipulation to Vacate Scheduling Conference In Light Of Tentative Class Action Settlement and Order Thereon;signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 08/11/2015. (Yu, L)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

Gregory N. Karasik (SBN 115834)
Karasik Law Firm
11835 W. Olympic Blvd. Ste. 1275
Los Angeles, CA 90064
Tel [phone]
Fax [phone]
[e-mail]
Sahag Majarian II – State Bar No. 146621
Law Office of Sahag Majarian II
18250 Ventura Boulevard
Tarzana, California 91356 

Tel: [phone]; Fax: [phone]
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Plaintiff
FRANCISCO NIEVES REYES

9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

10
11
12

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
FRANCISCO NIEVES REYES, individually
and on behalf of other persons similarly
situated,

13

Plaintiffs,

14
15
16

vs.

Case No. 1:14-CV-00964 MJS
STIPULATION TO VACATE SCHEDULING
CONFERENCE IN LIGHT OF TENTATIVE
CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT and ORDER
THEREON

CVS PHARMACY, INC.; CAREMARK RX
LLC; and DOES 1 through 10.
Defendants.

17
18
19
20
21

Plaintiff Francisco Nieves Reyes (“Plaintiff”) and Defendants CVS Pharmacy, Inc. and CVS

22

Caremark Corporation (erroneously sued as Caremark RX LLC) (“Defendants”), by and through their

23

respective counsel of record, hereby enter into the following stipulation and mutually request the Court

24

to enter an order in accordance herewith.

25
26

STIPULATION
1.

A scheduling conference is presently set for August 31, 2015.

27
28

1
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO VACATE SCHEDULING CONFERENCE IN LIGHT OF
TENTATVE CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

1

2.

On July 30, 2015, the parties participated in a private mediation before mediator Barry

2

Winograd, Esq. At the mediation, the parties reached agreement on the material terms of a class action

3

settlement.

4

3.

The parties are in the process of preparing formal settlement documents and anticipate

5

that, following finalization of settlement documents, Plaintiff will file a motion for preliminary

6

approval of the settlement sometime within the next 30-60 days.

7
8

4.

In light of the foregoing, the parties mutually request that the scheduling conference set

for August 31, 2015 be vacated.

9
10

Dated: August 11, 2015

KARASIK LAW FIRM

11
12

By

13
14

Dated: August 11, 2015

/s/ Gregory N. Karasik
Gregory N. Karasik
Attorneys for Plaintiff
SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP

15
16

By

17

/s/ Jennifer B. Zargarof
Jennifer B. Zargarof
Attorneys for Defendants

18
19

ORDER

20

Good cause having been shown, the foregoing stipulation is hereby approved, and it is ordered

21

that the scheduling conference previously set for August 31, 2015 be vacated. The parties shall file a

22

Joint Report explaining the status of this case on or before November 2, 2015 and then every 30

23

days thereafter until further order of the Court to the contrary.

24
25
26
27
28

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

August 11, 2015

/s/

Michael J. Seng

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
2
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO VACATE SCHEDULING CONFERENCE IN LIGHT OF
TENTATVE CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

3
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO VACATE SCHEDULING CONFERENCE IN LIGHT OF
TENTATVE CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT