Trujillo v. Munoz

Filing 53

ORDER Following Initial Scheduling Conference; ORDER Directing Clerk to Send Plaintiff a Copy of the Order Setting an Initial Scheduling Conference and Requiring Initial Disclosures and Scheduling Conference Statements signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 02/12/2019. Initial Scheduling Conference set for 5/8/2019 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 10 (EPG) before Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean.(Flores, E)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

GUILLERMO CRUZ TRUJILLO,

12
13
14

Case No. 1:14-cv-00976-LJO-EPG (PC)

Plaintiff,

ORDER FOLLOWING INITIAL
SCHEDULING CONFERENCE

v.

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO SEND
PLAINTIFF A COPY OF THE ORDER
SETTING AN INITIAL SCHEDULING
CONFERENCE AND REQUIRING INITIAL
DISCLOSURES AND SCHEDULING
CONFERENCE STATEMENTS (ECF NO.
47)

ALVAREZ,

15

Defendant.

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25

Guillermo Cruz Trujillo (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma
pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On February 4, 2019, the
Court attempted to hold an initial scheduling conference. Plaintiff telephonically appeared on
his own behalf. Counsel Lucas Hennes telephonically appeared on behalf of Defendant.
Due to Plaintiff’s non-compliance with the Court’s order setting an initial scheduling
conference and requiring initial disclosures and scheduling conference statements, the Court
did not hold the initial scheduling conference.
For the reasons stated on the record, IT IS ORDERED that:1

26

1. The Clerk of Court is directed to send Plaintiff a copy of the order setting an

27
28

1

To the extent Plaintiff has already complied with this order, he does not need to do so again.
1

1

initial scheduling conference and requiring initial disclosures and scheduling

2

conference statements (ECF No. 47).

3

2. Plaintiff has until March 4, 2019, to provide Defendant with his initial

4

disclosures. Failure to comply with this order may result in the dismissal of

5

Plaintiff’s case.

6

3. Plaintiff has until April 24, 2019, to file a scheduling conference statement.
Failure to comply with this order may result in the dismissal of Plaintiff’s case.

7
8

4. Plaintiff has until March 4, 2019, to serve Defendant with the relevant 602, as

9

well as all relevant documents related to exhaustion of administrative remedies

10

as to the claim proceeding in this case. Plaintiff does not to provide documents

11

he has already provided, or documents provided to him by Defendant. Failure to

12

comply with this order may result in the dismissal of Plaintiff’s case.

13

5. No later than April 24, 2019, Defendant shall file a supplemental scheduling

14

conference statement. The statement shall indicate whether Plaintiff served

15

Defendant with his initial disclosures, as well as Defendant’s position on

16

exhaustion of administrative remedies.

17

6. The initial scheduling conference is continued to May 8, 2019, at 9:30 a.m.

18
19
20

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

February 12, 2019

/s/
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2