Ramirez v. Bakersfield Police Dept., et al.
Filing
41
SCHEDULING ORDER, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 5/4/2015. Pleading Amendment Deadline 9/25/2015. Discovery Deadlines: Initial Disclosures 6/5/2015; Non-Expert 2/1/2016; Expert 4/8/2016. Mid-Discovery Status Conference set for 11 /10/2015 at 09:00 AM in Bakersfield at 510 19th Street (JLT) before Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston. Non-Dispositive Motion Deadlines: Filed by 4/18/2016; Hearing by 5/16/2016. Dispositive Motion Deadlines: Filed by 5/23/2016; Hearing by 7/5 /2016. Pretrial Conference set for 8/16/2016 at 08:30 AM in Bakersfield at 510 19th Street (JLT) before Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston. Jury Trial set for 9/26/2016 at 08:30 AM in Bakersfield at 510 19th Street (JLT) before Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston. (Hall, S)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
ANTONIO RAMIREZ, JR.,
12
13
Plaintiff,
v.
14
BAKERSFIELD POLICE DEPT., et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
1:14-CV-00978- JLT
SCHEDULING ORDER (Fed. R. Civ. P. 16)
Pleading Amendment Deadline: 9/25/2015
Discovery Deadlines:
Initial Disclosures: 6/5/2015
Non-Expert: 2/1/2016
Expert: 4/8/2016
Mid-Discovery Status Conference:
11/10/2015 at 9:00 a.m.
17
18
Non-Dispositive Motion Deadlines:
Filing: 4/18/2016
Hearing: 5/16/2016
19
20
21
Dispositive Motion Deadlines:
Filing: 5/23/2016
Hearing: 7/5/2016
22
23
Pre-Trial Conference:
8/16/2016 at 8:30 a.m.
510 19th Street, Bakersfield, CA
24
25
Trial: 9/26/2016 at 8:30 a.m.
510 19th Street, Bakersfield, CA
Jury trial: 3-5 days
26
27
28
1
1
I.
May 4, 2015.
2
3
Date of Scheduling Conference
II.
Appearances of Counsel
4
Plaintiff appeared in pro per.
5
Heather Cohen appeared on behalf of Defendants.
6
III.
Pleading Amendment Deadline
Any requested pleading amendments are ordered to be filed, either through a stipulation or
7
8
motion to amend, no later than September 25, 2015.
9
IV.
10
11
12
13
14
Discovery Plan and Cut-Off Date
The parties are ordered to exchange the initial disclosures required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1)
on or before June 5, 2015.
The parties are ordered to complete all discovery, pertaining to non-experts on or before
February 1, 2016, and all discovery related to experts no later than April 8, 2016.
The parties are directed to disclose all expert witnesses, in writing, on or before February 12,
15
2016, and to disclose all rebuttal experts on or before March 11, 2016. The written designation of
16
retained and non-retained experts shall be made pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. Rule 26(a)(2), (A), (B),
17
and (C) and shall include all information required thereunder. Failure to designate experts in
18
compliance with this order may result in the Court excluding the testimony or other evidence offered
19
through such experts that are not disclosed pursuant to this order.
20
The written designation of retained and non-retained experts shall be made pursuant to Fed. R.
21
Civ. P. 26(a)(2), (A), (B), and (C) and shall include all information required thereunder. Failure to
22
designate experts in compliance with this order may result in the Court excluding the testimony or other
23
evidence offered through such experts that are not disclosed pursuant to this order.
24
The provisions of Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(b)(4) and (5) shall apply to all discovery relating to experts
25
and their opinions. Experts must be fully prepared to be examined on all subjects and opinions
26
included in the designation. Failure to comply will result in the imposition of sanctions, which may
27
include striking the expert designation and preclusion of expert testimony.
28
The provisions of Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(e) regarding a party’s duty to timely supplement
2
1
disclosures and responses to discovery requests will be strictly enforced.
A mid-discovery status conference is scheduled for November 10, 2015, at 9:00 a.m. before the
2
3
Honorable Jennifer L. Thurston, United States Magistrate Judge, at the United States District
4
Courthouse located at 510 19th Street, Bakersfield, California. A Joint Mid-Discovery Status
5
Conference Report, carefully prepared and executed by all counsel, shall be electronically filed in
6
CM/ECF, one (1) full week prior to the Conference and shall be e-mailed, in Word format to,
7
JLTorders@caed.uscourts.gov. Counsel may appear by telephone, provided a written request to so
8
appear is made to the Magistrate Judge's Courtroom Clerk no later than five (5) court days before the
9
noticed hearing date. In the event that more than one attorney requests to appear by telephone then it
10
shall be the obligation of the requesting part(ies) to arrange a Court Call conference.
11
V.
12
Pre-Trial Motion Schedule
All non-dispositive pre-trial motions, including any discovery motions, shall be filed no later
13
than April 18, 2016, and heard on or before May 16, 2016. Non-dispositive motions are heard at 9:00
14
a.m. at the United States District Courthouse in Bakersfield, California, before the Honorable Jennifer
15
L. Thurston, United States Magistrate Judge.
16
No written discovery motions shall be filed without the prior approval of the assigned
17
Magistrate Judge. A party with a discovery dispute must first confer with the opposing party in a good
18
faith effort to resolve by agreement the issues in dispute. If that good faith effort is unsuccessful, the
19
moving party promptly shall seek a telephonic hearing with all involved parties and the Magistrate
20
Judge. It shall be the obligation of the moving party to arrange and originate the conference call to the
21
court. To schedule this telephonic hearing, the parties are ordered to contact Courtroom Deputy Clerk,
22
Susan Hall at (661) 326-6620 or via email at SHall@caed.uscourts.gov. Counsel must comply with
23
Local Rule 251 with respect to discovery disputes or the motion will be denied without prejudice
24
and dropped from calendar.
25
In scheduling such motions, the Magistrate Judge may grant applications for an order shortening
26
time pursuant to Local Rule 144(e). However, if counsel does not obtain an order shortening time, the
27
notice of motion must comply with Local Rule 251.
28
Counsel may appear and argue non-dispositive motions by telephone, provided a written request
3
1
to so appear is made to the Magistrate Judge's Courtroom Clerk no later than five (5) court days before
2
the noticed hearing date. In the event that more than one attorney requests to appear by telephone then
3
it shall be the obligation of the moving part(ies) to arrange and originate a conference call to the court.
4
All dispositive pre-trial motions shall be filed no later than May 23, 2016, and heard no later
5
than July 5, 2016, before the Honorable Jennifer L. Thurston, United States Magistrate Judge, at the
6
United States District Courthouse in Bakersfield, California. In scheduling such motions, counsel shall
7
comply with Fed. R. Civ. P. 56 and Local Rules 230 and 260.
8
VI.
Motions for Summary Judgment or Summary Adjudication
The parties may file a dispositive motion related to the Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477 (1994)
9
10
issue without prejudice to their filing a second dispositive motion on the merits. The parties are
11
excused from the requirement of a pre-filing meet-and-confer session and from the requirement to file a
12
joint statement of facts.
13
VII.
14
15
16
Pre-Trial Conference Date
August 16, 2016, at 8:30 a.m. at the United States District Courthouse in Bakersfield,
California before the Honorable Jennifer L. Thurston, United States Magistrate Judge.
The parties are ordered to file a Joint Pretrial Statement pursuant to Local Rule 281(a)(2).
17
The parties are further directed to submit a digital copy of their pretrial statement in Word format,
18
directly to Judge Thurston’s chambers, by email at JLTOrders@caed.uscourts.gov.
19
Counsels' attention is directed to Rules 281 and 282 of the Local Rules of Practice for the
20
Eastern District of California, as to the obligations of counsel in preparing for the pre-trial conference.
21
The Court will insist upon strict compliance with those rules. In addition to the matters set forth in the
22
Local Rules the Joint Pretrial Statement shall include a Joint Statement of the case to be used by the
23
Court to explain the nature of the case to the jury during voir dire.
24
VIII. Trial Date
25
26
September 26, 2016, at 8:30 a.m. at the United States District Courthouse in Bakersfield,
California, before the Honorable Jennifer L. Thurston, United States Magistrate Judge.
27
A.
This is a Jury trial.
28
B.
Counsels' Estimate of Trial Time: 3-5 days.
4
C.
1
Counsels' attention is directed to Local Rules of Practice for the Eastern District of
2
California, Rule 285.
3
IX.
Settlement Conference
If the parties believe the matter is in a settlement posture and desire a settlement conference,
4
5
they may file a joint request that the Court schedule a settlement conference.
6
X.
Request for Bifurcation, Appointment of Special Master, or other Techniques to Shorten
7
Trial
8
Not applicable at this time.
9
XI.
There are no pending related matters.
10
11
Related Matters Pending
XII.
Compliance with Federal Procedure
All counsel are expected to familiarize themselves with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure
12
13
and the Local Rules of Practice of the Eastern District of California, and to keep abreast of any
14
amendments thereto. The Court must insist upon compliance with these Rules to efficiently handle its
15
increasing case load, and sanctions will be imposed for failure to follow both the Federal Rules of Civil
16
Procedure and the Local Rules of Practice for the Eastern District of California.
17
XIII. Effect of this Order
The foregoing order represents the best estimate of the court and counsel as to the agenda most
18
19
suitable to dispose of this case. The trial date reserved is specifically reserved for this case. If the
20
parties determine at any time that the schedule outlined in this order cannot be met, counsel are ordered
21
to notify the court immediately of that fact so that adjustments may be made, either by stipulation or by
22
subsequent status conference.
The dates set in this Order are considered to be firm and will not be modified absent a
23
24
showing of good cause even if the request to modify is made by stipulation. Stipulations
25
extending the deadlines contained herein will not be considered unless they are accompanied by
26
affidavits or declarations, and where appropriate attached exhibits, which establish good cause
27
for granting the relief requested.
28
///
5
1
Failure to comply with this order may result in the imposition of sanctions.
2
3
4
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
May 4, 2015
/s/ Jennifer L. Thurston
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
6
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?