Ramirez v. Bakersfield Police Dept., et al.
Filing
8
ORDER Directing Service of Plaintiff's Complaint, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 07/23/14. Service is Appropriate for Officer Randy Petris and Officer Scott Roberts. 21-Day Deadline. (Attachments: # 1 USM Forms & Instructions, # 2 Complaint Filed 06/23/14)(Gonzalez, R)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
Plaintiff,
12
13
14
) Case No.: 1:14-cv-00978 - AWI - JLT
)
) ORDER DIRECTING SERVICE OF PLAINTIFF’S
) COMPLAINT
)
)
)
)
)
)
ANTONIO RAMIREZ, JR.,
v.
CHAD GARRETT, et al.,
Defendants.
15
16
17
Antonio Rameriz, Jr. is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this action for a violation
18
of his civil rightsby officers of the Bakersfield Police Department. Previously, the Court screened the
19
complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) and determined Plaintiff stated a cognizable claim for
20
excessive force by Officers Roberts and Petris in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment. (Doc. 5.)
21
Plaintiff filed a notice of his willingness to proceed only on these claims on July 17, 2014. (Doc. 6.)
22
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:
23
1.
Service of Plaintiff’s Complaint (Doc. 1) is appropriate for, and shall be initiated upon
the following defendants:
24
25
a.
Officer Randy Petris
26
b.
Officer Scott Roberts
27
28
2.
The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to send Plaintiff two (2) USM-285 forms, two (2)
summons, a Notice of Submission of Documents form, an instruction sheet and a copy
1
1
2
of the Complaint filed June 23, 2014 (Doc. 1);
3.
Within twenty-one (21) days from the date of this order, Plaintiff SHALL complete the
3
attached Notice of Submission of Documents and submit the completed Notice to the
4
Court with the following documents:
5
a.
One completed summons for each defendant to be served;
6
b.
One completed USM-285 form for each defendant; and
7
c.
Three (3) copies of the Complaint filed June 23, 2014;
8
4.
9
10
The U.S. Marshal is DIRECTED to serve a copy of the Complaint, summons, and this
order upon the defendants as directed by Plaintiff in the USM forms.
5.
11
Plaintiff is cautioned that failure to comply with this order will result in a
recommendation that theaction be dismissed pursuant to Local Rule 110.
12
13
14
15
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
July 23, 2014
/s/ Jennifer L. Thurston
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?