Garcia v. Montgomery

Filing 41

ORDER Granting 39 Motion to File Excessive Documents, signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 8/10/17. (Gonzalez, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 RICHARD MIGUEL GARCIA, Petitioner, 11 12 Case No. 1:14-cv-00980-DAD-MJS (HC) ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO FILE EXCESSIVE DOCUMENTS v. (ECF NO. 39) 13 14 STUART SHERMAN, Warden, Respondent. 15 16 17 18 Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas 19 corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Stuart Sherman, Warden of Corcoran State Prison, is 20 hereby substituted as the proper named respondent pursuant to Rule 25(d) of the 21 Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Respondent is represented by Jeffrey White of the 22 Office of the California Attorney General. 23 On July 19, 2017, Petitioner filed his traverse (ECF No. 40), along with a Motion 24 to File Excessive Documents in Support of Traverse (ECF No. 39). The traverse is 25 handwritten and sixty pages long, including the caption and table of contents. It is 26 accompanied by an additional six pages of exhibits. The Court has not limited the length 27 of Petitioner’s traverse, and thus Petitioner’s request unnecessary. In any event, the 28 1 Court notes that Respondent’s answer runs 42 pages. While the traverse likely could 2 have been shorter, it is not excessive. It will be considered in its entirety in due course. 3 Accordingly, Petitioner’s motion is HEREBY GRANTED. 4 5 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: August 10, 2017 /s/ 7 Michael J. Seng UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?