Flores v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 25

ORDER DIRECTING Defendant to File a Response Brief. Response Brief DUE May 9, 2016. ORDER DISCHARGING Order to Show Cause (Doc. 23). signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 4/8/2016. (Herman, H)

Download PDF
1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 6 RICHARD P. FLORES, Plaintiff, 7 8 Case No. 1:14-cv-1005 DAD-BAM ORDER DIRECTING DEFENDANT TO FILE A RESPONSE BRIEF v. RESPONSE BRIEF DUE May 9, 2016 9 COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, ORDER DISCHARGING ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE Defendant. 10 11 12 The Court previously ordered pro se Plaintiff Richard Flores to show cause why his case 13 should not be dismissed for his failure to file an opening brief. (Doc. 23). In response to the 14 order to show cause, Plaintiff filed a declaration with the Court stating that he is seeking 15 retroactive disability benefits based on a disability beginning in October 2009. (Doc. 24). 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Plaintiff also directs the Court to the “additional medical records” filed on April 21, 2015 in support of his appeal. (Doc. 9). The Court concludes that Plaintiff has filed all the briefing he intends to file in support of his appeal, and that Defendant’s response to the briefing is now due. Accordingly, within 30 days from the date of this order, Defendant is ORDERED to file a response to Plaintiff’s briefing. Having considered Plaintiff’s response, the Court’s Order to Show Cause (Doc. 23), is HEREBY DISCHARGED. IT IS SO ORDERED. 24 25 Dated: /s/ Barbara April 8, 2016 A. McAuliffe _ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 26 27 28 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?