Cranford v. C. et al

Filing 24

ORDER Denying Plaintiff's 23 Motion for Permission to Appeal as Moot, signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 3/25/15. (Verduzco, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 ARCHIE CRANFORD, 9 Plaintiff, 10 11 v. JESSICA C., et al. 12 Defendants. 13 14 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 1:14-cv-01025-BAM ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PERMISSION TO APPEAL AS MOOT (ECF No. 7) Plaintiff Archie Cranford (“Plaintiff”) is a civil detainee proceeding pro se and in forma 15 pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff initiated this action on 16 June 30, 2014, and consented to the jurisdiction of a United States Magistrate Judge. (ECF Nos. 17 1, 5.) On March 3, 2015, the Court dismissed this action based on Plaintiff’s failure to state a 18 claim and judgment was entered. (ECF Nos. 16, 17.) Plaintiff appealed on March 12, 2015, and 19 the appeal was processed to the Ninth Circuit on March 13, 2015. (ECF Nos. 18, 19.) 20 On March 23, 2015, Plaintiff filed a motion requesting permission to appeal, along with a 21 request for all the necessary forms and records for an appeal. (ECF No. 23.) Plaintiff’s request 22 is unnecessary because his appeal has been processed to the Ninth Circuit. Accordingly, 23 Plaintiff’s motion requesting permission to appeal is HEREBY DENIED as moot. 24 IT IS SO ORDERED. 25 Dated: /s/ Barbara March 25, 2015 26 A. McAuliffe _ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 27 28 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?