Garbarini v. Ulit et al
Filing
51
ORDER Regarding Plaintiff's 45 Motion for Timely Screening of the First Amended Complaint and Granting 48 Motion for Copy of Docket Sheet, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 9/30/15. (Gonzalez, R)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
RALPH GARBARINI,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
15
v.
WAYNE ULIT, et al.,
Defendants.
16
17
18
19
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No.: 1:14-cv-01058-AWI-SAB (PC)
ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION
FOR TIMELY SCREENING OF THE FIRST
AMENDED COMPLAINT AND GRANTING
MOTION FOR COPY OF DOCKET SHEET
[ECF Nos. 45, 48]
Plaintiff Ralph Garbarini is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action
pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
On September 30, 2015, the Court granted Plaintiff’s motion for leave to file a first amended
20
complaint and Plaintiff’s first amended complaint lodged on July 6, 2015 was ordered filed. (ECF No.
21
49.) The Court also denied Plaintiff’s pending motion for summary judgment as moot. (ECF No. 49.)
22
23
24
Now pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion for timely screening of the first amended
complaint and motion requesting a copy of the Court docket sheet. (ECF Nos. 45, 48.)
Inasmuch as Plaintiff’s first amended complaint was ordered filed on September 30, 2015,
25
Plaintiff is advised that the Court will screen Plaintiff’s first amended complaint in due course.
26
To the extent Plaintiff’s motion is construed as seeking to have his complaint screened immediately,
27
his request is rejected. The Eastern District of California is laboring under one of the heaviest
28
caseloads per judge in the nation and a significant percentage of those cases are pro se prisoner civil
1
1
rights cases. Plaintiff may be assured that his complaint will be screened in due course, but he lacks
2
legal entitlement to demand that his case be moved to the front of the line for review. 28 U.S.C. §
3
1915A.
4
Plaintiff requests a copy of the Court’s docket sheet for this case. Although Plaintiff does not
5
indicate the need for a copy of the court’s docket sheet in this case, in the interest of justice the Court
6
will provide Plaintiff a copy of the docket sheet. However, Plaintiff is advised that the Clerk does not
7
provide free copies of case documents to parties. The Clerk charges $.50 per page for copies of
8
documents. See 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a). Copies of up to twenty pages may be made by the Clerk’s
9
Office at this Court upon written request and prepayment of the copy fees. The fact that the Court has
10
granted leave for Plaintiff to proceed in forma pauperis does not entitle him to free copies of
11
documents of the Court. Under 28 U.S.C. § 2250, the Clerk is not required to furnish copies without
12
cost to an indigent plaintiff except by order of the judge.
13
Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that:
14
1.
Plaintiff’s first amended complaint will be screened in due course; and
15
2.
The Clerk of Court is directed to send Plaintiff a copy of the docket sheet for this case.
16
IT IS SO ORDERED.
17
Dated:
18
September 30, 2015
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
3.
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?