Moore v. Saniefar et al

Filing 95

ORDER GRANTING MODIFICATION OF SCHEDULING ORDER: Motion for Summary Judgment 89 and 90 currently set for 1/11/2017, is CONTINUED to 2/15/2017, at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 7 (SKO) before Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto. Settlement Conference currently set for 1/10/2017, is CONTINUED to 2/27/2017, at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 9 (SAB) before Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone. Minute order signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 12/28/2016. (Thorp, J)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 RONALD MOORE, 10 Plaintiff, 11 13 FATEMAH SANIEFAR, et al., Defendants. 14 15 ORDER MODIFYING SCHEDULING ORDER (Doc. 92) v. 12 Case No. 1:14-cv-01067-SKO _____________________________________/ 16 Before the Court is the parties’ joint Stipulation Modifying Scheduling Order, in which the 17 18 parties request that the Court alter certain dates in the operative Scheduling Order for this action 19 (the “Request”). (Doc. 92.) For good cause shown, the Court GRANTS the parties’ Request. 20 (Id.) 21 Accordingly, the Court ORDERS the following: 22 23 (1) The hearing date for dispositive motions, including Defendants’ pending Motion 24 for Summary Judgment (the “Motion”), (Doc. 90), is continued from January 11, 25 2017 to February 15, 2017 at 9:30 a.m. 26 27 28 (2) 1 Plaintiff shall file his opposition brief to the Motion no later than February 1, 2 2017, and Defendants shall file their reply brief in support of the Motion by 3 February 8, 2017. 4 (3) 5 The settlement conference in this case is continued from January 10, 2017, to February 27, 2017, at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom 9 before the Honorable Stanley A. 6 Boone. 7 8 9 IT IS SO ORDERED. 10 Dated: 11 December 28, 2016 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 .

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?