Verduzco v. Gipson et al
Filing
32
ORDER Adopting 27 Findings and Recommendations, Dismissing Claims and Defendants, signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 2/8/17. A. Cruz, M. Cuevas, K. A. Dicks, Connie Gipson, D. Goree, A. Johnson, T. Perez, J. Amaya and T. Campbell Terminated. (Gonzalez, R)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
RICARDO VERDUZCO,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
v.
C. GIPSON, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No.: 1:14-cv-01083-AWI-SAB (PC)
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS, DISMISSING CLAIMS
AND DEFENDANTS
[ECF No. 27]
17
18
Plaintiff Ricardo Verduzco is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action
19
pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to
20
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
21
On December 6, 2016, the Magistrate Judge issued Findings and Recommendations
22
recommending that this case proceed on Plaintiff’s claim against Defendant Rousseau for a due
23
process violation related to his disciplinary hearing, and for retaliation in violation of the First
24
Amendment, and that all other claims and defendants be dismissed from this action for failure to state
25
a cognizable claim upon which relief may be granted. (ECF No. 27.) The Findings and
26
Recommendations were served on Plaintiff and contained notice that objections were to be filed within
27
fourteen days. Over fourteen days have passed, and no objections were filed.
28
///
1
1
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), the Court has conducted a de
2
novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the Findings and
3
Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.
4
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
5
1.
adopted in full;
6
7
The Findings and Recommendations issued December 6, 2016 (ECF No. 27), are
2.
This action shall proceed on Plaintiff’s claim against Defendant Rousseau for a due process
8
violation related to his disciplinary hearing, and for retaliation in violation of the First
9
Amendment;
10
3.
All other claims, and Defendants Connie Gipson, T. Perez, D. Goree, T. Campbell,
11
K.A. Dicks, A. Johnson, J. Amaya, A. Cruz, and M. Cuevas, are dismissed from this
12
action for the failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted; and
13
14
4.
The Clerk of the Court is directed to update the case caption and docket to reflect the
foregoing dismissals.
15
16
IT IS SO ORDERED.
17
Dated: February 8, 2017
18
SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?