Patterson v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.

Filing 36

ORDER GRANTING 35 Stipulation to Extend the Deadline By Which Defendants Shall Respond to the Complaint, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 9/23/2015. (Hall, S)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

KAREAMA PATTERSON,
Plaintiff,

12
13
14

v.
BAYER HEALTHCARE
PHARMACEUTICALS INC., et al.,

15
Defendant.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No.: 1:14-cv-01087 LJO JLT
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO EXTEND
THE DEADLINE BY WHICH DEFENDANTS
SHALL RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT
(Doc. 35)

16
17

Before the Court is the stipulation of the parties allowing Bayer Pharma AG and Bayer OY to

18

file a single responsive pleading within 21 days after service occurs on Bayer Pharma AG. (Doc. 35 at

19

2) Both of these foreign defendants must be served according to the Hague Convention. Id. Service on

20

Bayer OY has been completed but it has not been completed as to Bayer Pharma AG. Id. Therefore,

21

the Court ORDERS:

22
23
24
25

1.

No later than 21 days after service on Bayer Pharma AG occurs, this defendant and

Bayer OY SHALL file their joint responsive pleading;
2.

No later than October 9, 2015 and every 21 days thereafter, Plaintiff SHALL file a

report detailing the status of service on Bayer Pharma AG until such time as service is achieved.

26
27
28

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

September 23, 2015

/s/ Jennifer L. Thurston
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE