Schmidt v. Rodrigues et al
ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO COMPEL THE COURT TO SEND A SIGNED COPY OF THE ORDER DIRECTING SERVICE BY THE UNITED STATES MARSHAL re 27 signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 5/4/2015. (Lundstrom, T)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
RODRIGUES, et al.,
Case No.: 1:14-cv-01092-SAB (PC)
ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION
TO COMPEL THE COURT TO SEND A SIGNED
COPY OF THE ORDER DIRECTING SERVICE
BY THE UNITED STATES MARSHAL
[ECF No. 27]
Plaintiff Mark Schmidt is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action
pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
On May 1, 2015, Plaintiff filed a motion to compel requesting the Clerk of Court to send him a
copy of the Court’s April 2, 2015, with an original signature by the undersigned.
Plaintiff is advised that pursuant to the Local Rules of this Court the use of electronic
signatures is permitted. See Local Rules 101, 131. An electronic signature is authorized and carries
the same weight as that of a handwritten signature. Thus, Plaintiff’s preference for a handwritten
signature provides no basis to challenge the legality and enforcement of the Court’s April 2, 2015,
order, and his motion to compel a copy of the order with a handwritten signature is DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
May 4, 2015
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?