K.E.C. v. County of Kern, et al.
Filing
58
ORDER GRANTING #57 Stipulation to Continue the Settlement Conference, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 6/21/2016. Settlement Conference CONTINUED to 8/12/2016 at 01:30 PM in Bakersfield at 510 19th Street (JLT) before Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston. (Hall, S)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
THERESA A. GOLDNER, COUNTY COUNSEL
By: Marshall S. Fontes, Deputy (SBN 139567)
Kern County Administrative Center
1115 Truxtun Avenue, Fourth Floor
Bakersfield, CA 93301
Telephone 661-868-3800
Fax 661-868-3805
Attorneys for Defendants
County of Kern, Deputy Jason Ayala
and Deputy Joshua Bathe
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
KEANU ETHAN CAMPOS, a minor, by
and through his Guardian ad Litem,
Deniz Gonzalez,
Plaintiffs,
vs.
COUNTY OF KERN, a public entity;
DEPUTY JASON AYALA, a public
employee; DEPUTY JOSHUA BATHE, a
public employee; and DOES 1 - 10,
Inclusive
20
CASE NO. 1:14-cv-01099-DAD-JLT
JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE
THE MANDATORY SETTLEMENT
CONFERENCE PENDING
RESOLUTION OF DEFENDANTS’
MOTION FOR SUMMARY
JUDGMENT; [PROPOSED ORDER]
(Doc. 57)
Defendants.
21
22
COME NOW, Plaintiff, KEANU ETHAN CAMPOS, by and through his Guardian
23
ad Litem, Deniz Gonzalez and Defendants, COUNTY OF KERN, DEPUTY JASON
24
AYALA an DEPUTY JOSHUA BATHE, who have met and conferred through their
25
respective attorneys of record, and now make this joint stipulated request of the Court:
26
REPRESENTATIONS AND JOINT STIPULATION AND REQUEST:
27
1.
28
The Mandatory Settlement Conference (“MSC”) in this matter is currently
set before Magistrate Judge, Jennifer L. Thurston, on June 28, 2016 at 1:30 p.m.;
1
______________________________________________________________________
Joint Stipulation to Continue MSC Date
1
2.
Defendants have filed a motion for summary judgment (“MSJ”) as to all
2
claims. The motion has been briefed and argued. The Court took the matter under
3
submission on March 15, 2016, and thereafter requested supplemental briefing from the
4
parties which was completed on March 31, 2016.
5
3.
On May 17, 2016, the Court vacated the trial and pretrial dates, because
6
of the pending MSJ which had not been ruled upon (Docket #56). The Court also
7
continued the MSC to June 28, 2016. At the present time, there has still been no ruling
8
yet on the MSJ from the Court.
9
4.
Plaintiff and Defendants have timely exchanged settlement demands and
10
offers, but believe that a settlement conference, prior to the resolution of the issues
11
raised in the MSJ, will not be productive and therefore, the case currently is not
12
postured for meaningful negotiations or potential settlement;
13
5.
Therefore, Plaintiff and Defendants mutually invoke the provision made in
14
the Scheduling Order (Doc. No. 26, p. 6, Section X, fn. 3) and stipulate that the Court
15
continue the MSC set for June 28, 2016 to a date/time convenient to the Court which is
16
approximately 60 days out from the current date.
17
Dated: June 20, 2016
THERESA A. GOLDNER, COUNTY COUNSEL
18
By: /s/ Marshall S. Fontes
.
Marshall S. Fontes, Deputy
Attorneys for Defendants, County of Kern,
Deputy Jason Ayala and Deputy Joshua
Bathe
19
20
21
22
23
Dated: June 20, 2016
LAW OFFICES OF GARROTTO & GARROTTO
24
25
By /s/ Greg Garrotto
.
Greg Garrotto, Esq.
Attorneys for Plaintiff, Keanu Ethan Campos,
a minor, by and through his Guardian ad
Litem, Deniz Gonzalez
26
27
28
2
______________________________________________________________________
Joint Stipulation to Continue MSC Date
1
[PROPOSED] ORDER
2
For GOOD CAUSE shown, and based upon the stipulation of the, the Court
3
4
5
ORDERS:
1.
The settlement conference, currently set on June 28, 2016 at 1:30 p.m., is
CONTINUED to August 12, 2016 at 1:30 p.m.
6
7
8
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
June 21, 2016
/s/ Jennifer L. Thurston
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
______________________________________________________________________
Joint Stipulation to Continue MSC Date
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?