K.E.C. v. County of Kern, et al.

Filing 58

ORDER GRANTING #57 Stipulation to Continue the Settlement Conference, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 6/21/2016. Settlement Conference CONTINUED to 8/12/2016 at 01:30 PM in Bakersfield at 510 19th Street (JLT) before Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston. (Hall, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 THERESA A. GOLDNER, COUNTY COUNSEL By: Marshall S. Fontes, Deputy (SBN 139567) Kern County Administrative Center 1115 Truxtun Avenue, Fourth Floor Bakersfield, CA 93301 Telephone 661-868-3800 Fax 661-868-3805 Attorneys for Defendants County of Kern, Deputy Jason Ayala and Deputy Joshua Bathe 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 KEANU ETHAN CAMPOS, a minor, by and through his Guardian ad Litem, Deniz Gonzalez, Plaintiffs, vs. COUNTY OF KERN, a public entity; DEPUTY JASON AYALA, a public employee; DEPUTY JOSHUA BATHE, a public employee; and DOES 1 - 10, Inclusive 20 CASE NO. 1:14-cv-01099-DAD-JLT JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE THE MANDATORY SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE PENDING RESOLUTION OF DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; [PROPOSED ORDER] (Doc. 57) Defendants. 21 22 COME NOW, Plaintiff, KEANU ETHAN CAMPOS, by and through his Guardian 23 ad Litem, Deniz Gonzalez and Defendants, COUNTY OF KERN, DEPUTY JASON 24 AYALA an DEPUTY JOSHUA BATHE, who have met and conferred through their 25 respective attorneys of record, and now make this joint stipulated request of the Court: 26 REPRESENTATIONS AND JOINT STIPULATION AND REQUEST: 27 1. 28 The Mandatory Settlement Conference (“MSC”) in this matter is currently set before Magistrate Judge, Jennifer L. Thurston, on June 28, 2016 at 1:30 p.m.; 1 ______________________________________________________________________ Joint Stipulation to Continue MSC Date 1 2. Defendants have filed a motion for summary judgment (“MSJ”) as to all 2 claims. The motion has been briefed and argued. The Court took the matter under 3 submission on March 15, 2016, and thereafter requested supplemental briefing from the 4 parties which was completed on March 31, 2016. 5 3. On May 17, 2016, the Court vacated the trial and pretrial dates, because 6 of the pending MSJ which had not been ruled upon (Docket #56). The Court also 7 continued the MSC to June 28, 2016. At the present time, there has still been no ruling 8 yet on the MSJ from the Court. 9 4. Plaintiff and Defendants have timely exchanged settlement demands and 10 offers, but believe that a settlement conference, prior to the resolution of the issues 11 raised in the MSJ, will not be productive and therefore, the case currently is not 12 postured for meaningful negotiations or potential settlement; 13 5. Therefore, Plaintiff and Defendants mutually invoke the provision made in 14 the Scheduling Order (Doc. No. 26, p. 6, Section X, fn. 3) and stipulate that the Court 15 continue the MSC set for June 28, 2016 to a date/time convenient to the Court which is 16 approximately 60 days out from the current date. 17 Dated: June 20, 2016 THERESA A. GOLDNER, COUNTY COUNSEL 18 By: /s/ Marshall S. Fontes . Marshall S. Fontes, Deputy Attorneys for Defendants, County of Kern, Deputy Jason Ayala and Deputy Joshua Bathe 19 20 21 22 23 Dated: June 20, 2016 LAW OFFICES OF GARROTTO & GARROTTO 24 25 By /s/ Greg Garrotto . Greg Garrotto, Esq. Attorneys for Plaintiff, Keanu Ethan Campos, a minor, by and through his Guardian ad Litem, Deniz Gonzalez 26 27 28 2 ______________________________________________________________________ Joint Stipulation to Continue MSC Date 1 [PROPOSED] ORDER 2 For GOOD CAUSE shown, and based upon the stipulation of the, the Court 3 4 5 ORDERS: 1. The settlement conference, currently set on June 28, 2016 at 1:30 p.m., is CONTINUED to August 12, 2016 at 1:30 p.m. 6 7 8 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: June 21, 2016 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 ______________________________________________________________________ Joint Stipulation to Continue MSC Date

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?