Smith v. Doe

Filing 7

ORDER DISMISSING Action Without Prejudice for Failure to Pay Filing Fee OR File Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 9/25/2014. CASE CLOSED. (Marrujo, C)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 CLEVELAND JAMES SMITH, JR., 11 Plaintiff, v. 12 13 ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR FAILURE TO PAY FILING FEE OR FILE APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS DOE, 14 Case No. 1:14-cv-01116-LJO-SKO (PC) Defendant. _____________________________________/ (Doc. 3) 15 16 Plaintiff Cleveland James Smith, Jr., a prisoner proceeding pro se, filed this civil action on 17 July 16, 2014. On July 21, 2014, the Court issued an order requiring Plaintiff to pay the $400.00 18 filing fee in full or file an application to proceed in forma pauperis on the form provided within 19 forty-five days. More than forty-five days have passed and Plaintiff has not complied with or 20 otherwise responded to the order. Plaintiff was warned that dismissal would occur if he failed to 21 obey the order. 22 A civil action may not proceed absent the submission of either the filing fee or a completed 23 application to proceed in forma pauperis. 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914, 1915. Based on Plaintiff’s failure to 24 comply with the Court’s order, dismissal of this action is appropriate. In re Phenylpropanolamine 25 (PPA) Products Liability Litigation, 460 F.3d 1217, 1226 (9th Cir. 2006); Local Rule 110. 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 1 Accordingly, the Court HEREBY ORDERS this action dismissed, without prejudice, for 2 failure to pay the filing fee or file a completed application to proceed in forma pauperis. 3 4 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: /s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill September 25, 2014 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?