Sawyer v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 23

STIPULATION and ORDER awarding plaintiff attorney fees under EAJA, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), in the amount of $5,600.00. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 6/28/2016. (Rooney, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 SHELLIE LOTT, SBN: 246202 Cerney Kreuze & Lott, LLP 42 N. Sutter Street, Suite 400 Stockton, California 95202 Telephone: (209) 948-9384 Facsimile: (209) 948-0706 5 6 Attorney for Plaintiff 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, FRESNO BRANCH 10 11 ELIZABETH M. SAWYER, Plaintiff, 12 13 vs. 14 CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, 15 16 Case No.: 1:14-CV-01124-EPG STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR THE AWARD OF ATTORNEY FEES PURSUANT TO THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d) Defendant 17 18 19 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties through their undersigned counsel, subject to the approval of the Court, that Plaintiff be awarded attorney fees under the 20 21 EAJA in the amount of FIVE THOUSAND SIX HUNDRED DOLLARS ($5,600.00). This 22 amount represents compensation for all legal services rendered on behalf of Plaintiff, to date, by 23 counsel in connection with this civil action, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 2412. 24 After the Court issues an order for EAJA fees and expenses to Plaintiff, the government 25 will consider the matter of Plaintiff's assignment of EAJA fees and expenses to Plaintiff's 26 27 28 attorney. Pursuant to Astrue v. Ratliff, 130 S.Ct. 2521 (2010), the ability to honor the assignment will depend on whether the fees and expenses are subject to any offset allowed under STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR THE AWARD OF ATTORNEY FEES PURSUANT TO THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d) 1 the United States Department of the Treasury's Offset Program. After the order for EAJA fees 2 and expenses is entered, the government will determine whether they are subject to any offset. 3 Fees and expenses shall be made payable to Plaintiff, but if the Department of the Treasury 4 5 determines that Plaintiff does not owe a federal debt, then the government shall cause the 6 payment of fees, expenses and costs to be made directly to Shellie Lott, pursuant to the 7 assignment executed by Plaintiff. Any payments made shall be delivered to Plaintiff's counsel. 8 9 This stipulation constitutes a compromise settlement of Plaintiff's request for EAJA attorney fees and expenses, and does not constitute an admission of liability on the part of 10 11 Defendant under the EAJA. Payment of the agreed amount shall constitute a complete release 12 from, and bar to, any and all claims that Plaintiff and/or Plaintiff's counsel may have relating to 13 EAJA attorney fees and expenses in connection with this action. 14 This award is without prejudice to the rights of Plaintiff's counsel to seek Social Security 15 Act attorney fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406, subject to the offset provisions of the EAJA. 16 Respectfully submitted, 17 18 Dated: June 22, 2016 19 20 BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney DEBORAH L. STACHEL Acting Regional Chief Counsel 21 22 23 24 25 /s/ Shellie Lott SHELLIE LOTT Attorney for Plaintiff Date: June 22, 2016 /s/Chantal Jenkins (As authorized via email on 06/22/16) CHANTAL JENKINS Special Assistant United States Attorney 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR THE AWARD OF ATTORNEY FEES PURSUANT TO THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d) 1 2 3 ORDER Pursuant to the above stipulation, Plaintiff shall be awarded attorney fees under the EAJA, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), in the amount of FIVE THOUSAND SIX HUNDRED DOLLARS 4 5 6 ($5,600.00). All fees shall be paid pursuant to Astrue v. Ratliff, 130 S.Ct. 2521 (2010), as agreed upon by the parties. 7 8 IT IS SO ORDERED. 9 10 11 Date: June 28, 2016 /s/ Erica P. Grosjean Erica P. Grosjean United States Magistrate Judge 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR THE AWARD OF ATTORNEY FEES PURSUANT TO THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?