Rodriguez v. Kraft Foods Group, Inc.

Filing 23

STIPULATION Extending Pre-Certification Discovery Dates; ORDER Extending Pre-Certification Discovery Dates and Briefing Schedule for Class Certification Motion and any Motion to Strike Class Claims signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 1/29/2015. Hearing on the Motion for Class Certification and any Motion to Strike Class/Representative Claims set for 12/11/2015 at 10:00 AM.(Martinez, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 DOUGLAS J. FARMER, Cal. Bar No. 139646 douglas.farmer@ogletreedeakins.com CHRISTOPHER M. AHEARN, Cal. Bar No. 239089 chris.ahearn@ogletreedeakins.com OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, P.C. Steuart Tower, Suite 1300 One Market Plaza San Francisco, CA 94105 Telephone: 415.442.4810 Facsimile: 415.442.4870 6 7 Attorneys for Defendant KRAFT FOODS GROUP, INC. 8 R. DUANE WESTRUP (State Bar No. 58610) PHILLIP R. POLINER (State Bar No. 156145) 9 ppoliner@wkalaw.com CAT N. BULAON (State Bar No. 206612) 10 cbulaon@wkalaw.com WESTRUP & ASSOCIATES 11 444 West Ocean Boulevard, Suite 1614 Long Beach, California 90802-4524 12 Telephone: 562.432.2551 Facsimile: 562.435.4856 13 Attorneys for Plaintiff 14 JOSE RODRIGUEZ 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 16 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 17 FRESNO DIVISION 18 19 JOSE RODRIGUEZ, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Case No. 1:14-CV-01137-LJO-GSA 20 Plaintiff, 21 22 23 24 STIPULATION EXTENDING PRECERTIFICATION DISCOVERY DATES; vs. ORDER EXTENDING PRECERTIFICATION DISCOVERY DATES KRAFT FOODS GROUP, INC., a Virginia AND BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR CLASS corporation; and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive, CERTIFICATION MOTION AND ANY MOTION TO STRIKE CLASS CLAIMS Defendant. 25 26 27 28 Case No. 1:14-CV-01137-LJO-GSA Plaintiff Jose Rodriguez and Defendant Kraft Foods Group, Inc. (collectively, the “Parties”) 1 2 respectfully submit this Stipulation Regarding Pre-Certification Discovery Dates. The Parties 3 jointly and respectfully request that the Court grant the relief sought by this Stipulation. 4 5 WHEREAS, the Parties have scheduled a mediation for April 1, 2015 with mediator Alan Berkowitz in San Francisco, California. 6 7 WHEREAS, the Parties have agreed to conduct only the discovery they have deemed necessary to settle the case prior to mediation, leaving more complete discovery until after 8 mediation in the event that the case does not settle. 9 WHEREAS, the Parties wish to build more time into the case schedule for discovery post- 10 mediation, which could be substantial, to avoid the need to conduct any such discovery pre- 11 mediation due to the need to comply with the Court’s pre-certification discovery deadlines. 12 WHEREAS, the Parties desire that the current deadline for motions relating to class 13 certification of August 21, 2015 remain in place. WHEREAS, in the Court’s November 3, 2014 Scheduling Conference Order (Dkt. No. 14 15 021), the Court set the following deadlines relevant to this stipulation: (a) Completion of non16 expert discovery related to class certification – May 1, 2015; (b) Completion of expert discovery 17 related to class certification – July 10, 2015; (c) deadline for filing any discovery or other non- 18 dispositive motions – July 17, 2015. 19 20 NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties, as follows: 21 (1) 22 continued to June 15, 2015; 23 (2) 24 A separate deadline for filing motions related to Non-Expert Discovery, and nondispositive motions unrelated to discovery should be set for June 30, 2015; 25 (2) 26 27 The deadline for Non-Expert Discovery related to Class Certification should be The deadline for Expert Discovery related to Class Certification should be continued to July 24, 2015; and /// 28 1 Case No. 1:14-CV-01137-LJO-GSA 1 (3) 2 The date for filing motions related to Expert Discovery should be continued July 31, 2015. 3 4 5 IT IS SO STIPULATED. DATED: January 27, 2015 6 OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, P.C. 7 8 By: 9 10 11 DATED: January 27, 2015 /s/ Christopher M. Ahearn DOUGLAS J. FARMER CHRISTOPHER M. AHEARN Attorneys for Defendant KRAFT FOODS GROUP, INC. WESTRUP & ASSOCIATES 12 13 By: /s/ Cat N. Bualon (as authorized on January 27, 2015) PHILLIP R. POLINER Attorneys for Plaintiff JOSE RODRIGUEZ 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 ORDER Based on the foregoing stipulation of the parties, the Court extends pre-certification discovery dates as follows: (1) 21 22 continued to June 15, 2015; (2) 23 24 27 28 The deadline for filing motions related to Non-Expert Discovery, and nondispositive motions unrelated to discovery, is continued to June 30, 2015; (2) 25 26 The cut-off deadline for Non-Expert Discovery related to Class Certification is The cut-off deadline for Expert Discovery related to Class Certification is continued to July 24, 2015; and (3) The deadline for filing motions related to Expert Discovery is continued July 31, 2015. In light of the modified discovery dates and extended non-dispositive motion filing 2 Case No. 1:14-CV-01137-LJO-GSA 1 deadlines, the Court hereby also extends the briefing schedule and hearing date for the parties’ 2 motion for class certification and any motion to strike class claims as follows: 3 4 5 Plaintiff’s Motion for Class Certification due: September 11, 2015 Defendant’s Motion to Strike Class/Representative Claims due: September 11, 2015 Defendant’s Opposition to Motion for Class Certification due: October 14, 2015 Plaintiff’s Opposition to Motion to Strike Class/Rep. Claims due: October 14, 2015 6 7 8 Plaintiff’s Reply due: November 11, 2015 Defendant’s Reply due: November 11, 2015 A hearing on the Motion for Class Certification and any Motion to Strike 9 Class/Representative Claims will be held on December 11, 2015 at 10:00 a.m. before the 10 11 12 magistrate judge to whom this case is reassigned upon Judge Austin’s expected retirement in October 2015. 13 14 15 16 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: January 29, 2015 /s/ Gary S. Austin UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 Case No. 1:14-CV-01137-LJO-GSA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?