Rodriguez v. Kraft Foods Group, Inc.
Filing
23
STIPULATION Extending Pre-Certification Discovery Dates; ORDER Extending Pre-Certification Discovery Dates and Briefing Schedule for Class Certification Motion and any Motion to Strike Class Claims signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 1/29/2015. Hearing on the Motion for Class Certification and any Motion to Strike Class/Representative Claims set for 12/11/2015 at 10:00 AM.(Martinez, A)
1
2
3
4
5
DOUGLAS J. FARMER, Cal. Bar No. 139646
douglas.farmer@ogletreedeakins.com
CHRISTOPHER M. AHEARN, Cal. Bar No. 239089
chris.ahearn@ogletreedeakins.com
OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, P.C.
Steuart Tower, Suite 1300
One Market Plaza
San Francisco, CA 94105
Telephone:
415.442.4810
Facsimile:
415.442.4870
6
7
Attorneys for Defendant
KRAFT FOODS GROUP, INC.
8 R. DUANE WESTRUP (State Bar No. 58610)
PHILLIP R. POLINER (State Bar No. 156145)
9 ppoliner@wkalaw.com
CAT N. BULAON (State Bar No. 206612)
10 cbulaon@wkalaw.com
WESTRUP & ASSOCIATES
11 444 West Ocean Boulevard, Suite 1614
Long Beach, California 90802-4524
12 Telephone:
562.432.2551
Facsimile:
562.435.4856
13
Attorneys for Plaintiff
14 JOSE RODRIGUEZ
15
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
16
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
17
FRESNO DIVISION
18
19
JOSE RODRIGUEZ, on behalf of himself and
all others similarly situated,
Case No. 1:14-CV-01137-LJO-GSA
20
Plaintiff,
21
22
23
24
STIPULATION EXTENDING PRECERTIFICATION DISCOVERY DATES;
vs.
ORDER EXTENDING PRECERTIFICATION DISCOVERY DATES
KRAFT FOODS GROUP, INC., a Virginia
AND BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR CLASS
corporation; and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive, CERTIFICATION MOTION AND ANY
MOTION TO STRIKE CLASS CLAIMS
Defendant.
25
26
27
28
Case No. 1:14-CV-01137-LJO-GSA
Plaintiff Jose Rodriguez and Defendant Kraft Foods Group, Inc. (collectively, the “Parties”)
1
2
respectfully submit this Stipulation Regarding Pre-Certification Discovery Dates. The Parties
3
jointly and respectfully request that the Court grant the relief sought by this Stipulation.
4
5
WHEREAS, the Parties have scheduled a mediation for April 1, 2015 with mediator Alan
Berkowitz in San Francisco, California.
6
7
WHEREAS, the Parties have agreed to conduct only the discovery they have deemed
necessary to settle the case prior to mediation, leaving more complete discovery until after
8 mediation in the event that the case does not settle.
9
WHEREAS, the Parties wish to build more time into the case schedule for discovery post-
10
mediation, which could be substantial, to avoid the need to conduct any such discovery pre-
11
mediation due to the need to comply with the Court’s pre-certification discovery deadlines.
12
WHEREAS, the Parties desire that the current deadline for motions relating to class
13
certification of August 21, 2015 remain in place.
WHEREAS, in the Court’s November 3, 2014 Scheduling Conference Order (Dkt. No.
14
15 021), the Court set the following deadlines relevant to this stipulation: (a) Completion of non16
expert discovery related to class certification – May 1, 2015; (b) Completion of expert discovery
17
related to class certification – July 10, 2015; (c) deadline for filing any discovery or other non-
18
dispositive motions – July 17, 2015.
19
20
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties, as
follows:
21
(1)
22
continued to June 15, 2015;
23
(2)
24
A separate deadline for filing motions related to Non-Expert Discovery, and nondispositive motions unrelated to discovery should be set for June 30, 2015;
25
(2)
26
27
The deadline for Non-Expert Discovery related to Class Certification should be
The deadline for Expert Discovery related to Class Certification should be
continued to July 24, 2015; and
///
28
1
Case No. 1:14-CV-01137-LJO-GSA
1
(3)
2
The date for filing motions related to Expert Discovery should be continued July
31, 2015.
3
4
5
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
DATED: January 27, 2015
6
OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK &
STEWART, P.C.
7
8
By:
9
10
11
DATED: January 27, 2015
/s/ Christopher M. Ahearn
DOUGLAS J. FARMER
CHRISTOPHER M. AHEARN
Attorneys for Defendant
KRAFT FOODS GROUP, INC.
WESTRUP & ASSOCIATES
12
13
By: /s/ Cat N. Bualon (as authorized on January
27, 2015)
PHILLIP R. POLINER
Attorneys for Plaintiff
JOSE RODRIGUEZ
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
ORDER
Based on the foregoing stipulation of the parties, the Court extends pre-certification
discovery dates as follows:
(1)
21
22
continued to June 15, 2015;
(2)
23
24
27
28
The deadline for filing motions related to Non-Expert Discovery, and nondispositive motions unrelated to discovery, is continued to June 30, 2015;
(2)
25
26
The cut-off deadline for Non-Expert Discovery related to Class Certification is
The cut-off deadline for Expert Discovery related to Class Certification is continued
to July 24, 2015; and
(3)
The deadline for filing motions related to Expert Discovery is continued July 31,
2015.
In light of the modified discovery dates and extended non-dispositive motion filing
2
Case No. 1:14-CV-01137-LJO-GSA
1
deadlines, the Court hereby also extends the briefing schedule and hearing date for the parties’
2
motion for class certification and any motion to strike class claims as follows:
3
4
5
Plaintiff’s Motion for Class Certification due: September 11, 2015
Defendant’s Motion to Strike Class/Representative Claims due: September 11, 2015
Defendant’s Opposition to Motion for Class Certification due: October 14, 2015
Plaintiff’s Opposition to Motion to Strike Class/Rep. Claims due: October 14, 2015
6
7
8
Plaintiff’s Reply due: November 11, 2015
Defendant’s Reply due: November 11, 2015
A hearing on the Motion for Class Certification and any Motion to Strike
9
Class/Representative Claims will be held on December 11, 2015 at 10:00 a.m. before the
10
11
12
magistrate judge to whom this case is reassigned upon Judge Austin’s expected retirement in
October 2015.
13
14
15
16
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
January 29, 2015
/s/ Gary S. Austin
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
Case No. 1:14-CV-01137-LJO-GSA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?