Moore v. Nimatex Co., Inc. et al

Filing 8

Plaintiff's Ex Parte Request to Continue Mandatory Scheduling Conference; ORDER - Initial SCHEDULING CONFERENCE is continued fromm 10/8/2014 to December 3, 2014 at 08:30 AM in Courtroom 8 (BAM) before Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe. signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 9/24/2014. (Herman, H)

1
2
3
4
5

Tanya E. Moore, SBN 206683
MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C.
332 North Second Street
San Jose, California 95112
Telephone [phone]
Facsimile [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Ronald Moore

6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21

RONALD MOORE,

)
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
vs.
)
)
NIMATEX CO., INC., aka NIMATEX, INC., )
)
et al.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)

No. 1:14-cv-01141---BAM
PLAINTIFF’S EX PARTE REQUEST TO
CONTINUE MANDATORY
SCHEDULING CONFERENCE; ORDER
New MSC Date:
Time:
Courtroom:

December 3, 2014
8:30 a.m.
8

Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe

WHEREAS, a Mandatory Scheduling Conference is currently scheduled in this matter
for October 8, 2014;

22

WHEREAS, Defendant, Nimatex Co., Inc., aka Nimatex, Inc. (“Nimatex”), was served

23

via substituted service with the documents mailed to Nimatex on September 19, 2014, such

24

that Nimatex’s responsive pleading is not due until October 20, 2014;

25

WHEREAS, Plaintiff, Ronald Moore (“Plaintiff”), and Defendant, Amandeep Singh

26

dba Stop N Save Gasoline aka Arco #82044 (“Singh”), who is presently self-represented, are

27

engaging in settlement discussions and Plaintiff is hopeful that a settlement can be reached

28

with Singh within the next month;
PLAINTIFF’S EX PARTE REQUEST TO CONTINUE MANDATORY SCHEDULING
CONFERENCE;ORDER
Page 1

1

NOW, THEREFORE, Plaintiff respectfully requests a continuance of the Mandatory

2

Scheduling Conference to a date on or after November 19, 2014 at the court’s convenience, in

3

order to allow Nimatex to appear in the action, and to allow the parties to meet and confer in

4

advance of the scheduling conference and to further exhaust settlement efforts prior to

5

expending Court resources.

6
7

Dated: September 23, 2014

MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C.

8
/s/ Tanya E. Moore
Tanya E. Moore
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Ronald Moore

9
10
11
12
ORDER

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21

Upon request by Plaintiff and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that
the Mandatory Scheduling Conference currently set for October 8, 2014 be continued to
December 3, 2014 at 8:30 am before Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe in
Courtroom 8 of the above-entitled Court. All other requirements set forth in the Court’s
Order Setting Mandatory Scheduling Conference (Doc. 3) shall remain unchanged. The
Parties are to file a Joint Scheduling Report no later than seven (7) days prior to the
Scheduling Conference.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

22
23

Dated:

/s/ Barbara

September 24, 2014

A. McAuliffe

_

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

24
25
26
27
28
PLAINTIFF’S EX PARTE REQUEST TO CONTINUE MANDATORY SCHEDULING
CONFERENCE;ORDER
Page 2