Moore v. Alkhal et al

Filing 16

STIPULATION and ORDER DISMISSING CASE signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 12/23/2014. CASE CLOSED.(Flores, E)

1
2
3
4
5
6

Tanya E. Moore, SBN 206683
MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C.
332 North Second Street
San Jose, California 95112
Telephone [phone]
Facsimile [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Ronald Moore

7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

RONALD MOORE,

12
13
14
15
16
17

Plaintiff,
vs.
DANIEL R. ALKHAL, et al.,
Defendants.

) No. 1:14-cv-01145-LJO-SAB
)
) STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF
) ACTION; ORDER
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF ACTION; ORDER
Page 1

1

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff Ronald Moore and Defendants

2

Daniel R. Khal aka Daniel R. Alkhal; Shelley Rae Khal aka Shelley Rae Alkhal; and Amarjit

3

Singh Dhanoa dba Bellevue Mini Mart, the parties to this action, by and through their

4

respective counsel, that pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), the above-

5

captioned action be dismissed with prejudice in its entirety.

6
7

Date: December 23, 2014

MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C.

8
/s/ Tanya E. Moore
Tanya E. Moore
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Ronald Moore

9
10
11

KAHN, SOARES & CONWAY LLP

12
13

/s/ Rissa A. Stuart
Rissa A. Stuart
Attorneys for Defendants
Daniel R. Khal aka Daniel R. Alkhal; Shelley Rae
Khal aka Shelley Rae Alkhal; and Amarjit Singh
Dhanoa dba Bellevue Mini Mart

14
15
16
17
18

ORDER

19
20
21
22
23
24

The parties having so stipulated,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action be dismissed with prejudice in its entirety.
SO ORDERED
Dated: December 23, 2014
/s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill
United States District Judge

25
26
27
28

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF ACTION; ORDER
Page 2