Shaw v. Edmondson et al

Filing 16

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF ACTION, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 12/4/2014. CASE CLOSED. (Hall, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 Tanya E. Moore, SBN 206683 MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C. 332 North Second Street San Jose, California 95112 Telephone (408) 298-2000 Facsimile (408) 298-6046 Email: tanya@moorelawfirm.com Attorneys for Plaintiff Cecil Shaw 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CECIL SHAW, 12 13 14 15 16 17 Plaintiff, vs. DEBRA EDMONDSON dba ZINGO’S CAFE, et al., Defendants. ) No. 1:14-cv-01147 JLT ) ) STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF ) ACTION; ORDER ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF ACTION; ORDER Page 1 1 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff Cecil Shaw and Defendants 2 Debra Edmondson dba Zingo’s Cafe and Michael J. Banducci, the parties to this action, by and 3 through their respective counsel, that pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), the above-captioned action be dismissed with prejudice in its entirety. Each 5 party is to bear its own attorneys’ fees and costs. 6 7 The Parties additionally hereby consent to jurisdiction of United States Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston for the limited purpose of dismissal of the action. 8 9 Date: December 4, 2014 MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C. 10 /s/ Tanya E. Moore Tanya E. Moore Attorneys for Plaintiff Cecil Shaw 11 12 13 VAUGHAN & ASSOCIATES 14 15 /s/ Cris C. Vaughan Cris C. Vaughan Attorneys for Defendants Debra Edmondson dba Zingo’s Cafe and Michael J. Banducci 16 17 18 19 ORDER 20 21 22 The parties having so stipulated, 23 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action be dismissed with prejudice in its entirety. 24 Each party shall bear its own attorney’s fees and costs. 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: December 4, 2014 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF ACTION; ORDER Page 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?