Shaw v. Edmondson et al
Filing
16
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF ACTION, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 12/4/2014. CASE CLOSED. (Hall, S)
1
2
3
4
5
Tanya E. Moore, SBN 206683
MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C.
332 North Second Street
San Jose, California 95112
Telephone (408) 298-2000
Facsimile (408) 298-6046
Email: tanya@moorelawfirm.com
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Cecil Shaw
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
CECIL SHAW,
12
13
14
15
16
17
Plaintiff,
vs.
DEBRA EDMONDSON dba ZINGO’S
CAFE, et al.,
Defendants.
) No. 1:14-cv-01147 JLT
)
) STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF
) ACTION; ORDER
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF ACTION; ORDER
Page 1
1
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff Cecil Shaw and Defendants
2
Debra Edmondson dba Zingo’s Cafe and Michael J. Banducci, the parties to this action, by and
3
through their respective counsel, that pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure
4
41(a)(1)(A)(ii), the above-captioned action be dismissed with prejudice in its entirety. Each
5
party is to bear its own attorneys’ fees and costs.
6
7
The Parties additionally hereby consent to jurisdiction of United States Magistrate Judge
Jennifer L. Thurston for the limited purpose of dismissal of the action.
8
9
Date: December 4, 2014
MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C.
10
/s/ Tanya E. Moore
Tanya E. Moore
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Cecil Shaw
11
12
13
VAUGHAN & ASSOCIATES
14
15
/s/ Cris C. Vaughan
Cris C. Vaughan
Attorneys for Defendants
Debra Edmondson dba Zingo’s Cafe and Michael
J. Banducci
16
17
18
19
ORDER
20
21
22
The parties having so stipulated,
23
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action be dismissed with prejudice in its entirety.
24
Each party shall bear its own attorney’s fees and costs.
25
26
27
28
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
December 4, 2014
/s/ Jennifer L. Thurston
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF ACTION; ORDER
Page 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?