Glaze v. Stane et al

Filing 11

ORDER to SHOW CAUSE Why Action Should not be Dismissed for Failure to Prosecute signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 12/2/2014. (Sant Agata, S)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

RODNEY GLAZE,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14

v.
STANE, et al.,

15

Defendants.

16

Case No.: 1:14-cv-01153-SAB (PC)
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ACTION
SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE
TO PROSECUTE
[ECF No. 9]

Plaintiff Rodney Glaze is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action

17
18

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.

19

On October 28, 2014, the undersigned screened Plaintiff’s complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §

20

1915A(a). Plaintiff was directed to file an amended complaint within thirty days or the action would

21

be dismissed, with prejudice, for failure to state a cognizable claim for relief. (ECF No. 9.) To date,

22

Plaintiff has failed to comply with the court order.

23

///

24

///

25

///

26

///

27

///

28

///
1

Accordingly, Plaintiff is HEREBY ORDERED to show cause within thirty (30) days from the

1
2

date of service of this order why this action should not be dismissed as a sanction against him for

3

failing to obey a court order and failing to prosecute this action. The failure to comply with this order,

4

or the failure to show good cause, will result in dismissal of the action.

5
6

IT IS SO ORDERED.

7

Dated:

8

December 2, 2014
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2