Shehee v. Nguyen et al
Filing
60
ORDER DIRECTING Plaintiff to File Notice of Intent to Withdraw or Pursue Motion to Compel; Fourteen Day Deadline signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 2/24/2017. (Sant Agata, S)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
GREGORY ELL SHEHEE,
12
Plaintiff,
13
v.
14
NGUYEN, et al.,
15
Case No.: 1:14-cv-01154-LJO-MJS (PC)
ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO FILE
NOTICE OF INTENT TO WITHDRAW OR
PURSUE MOTION TO COMPEL
(ECF Nos. 54 & 59)
Defendants.
FOURTEEN DAY DEADLINE
16
17
Plaintiff is a civil detainee proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil
18
rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The case proceeds on Plaintiff’s third
19
amended complaint against Defendants Audrey Long, April Leavens, Long Moua, and
20
Kim Nguyen for denying Plaintiff a cane and access to educational services in violation
21
of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”) and the Eighth Amendment of the United
22
States Constitution. (ECF No. 34.)
23
On January 26, 2017, Plaintiff filed a motion to compel. (ECF No. 54.) Defendants
24
did not file an opposition. Rather, on February 23, 2017, Defendants filed a notice stating
25
that on February 14, 2017, Plaintiff served Defendants with a notice of intention to
26
withdraw his motion to compel. (ECF No. 59.) Plaintiff did not file the same with the
27
Court.
28
The Court cannot deem Plaintiff’s motion to compel withdrawn unless Plaintiff files
1
1
a request to withdraw with the Court.
2
Accordingly, within fourteen (14) days of this order, Plaintiff must file with the
3
Court a notice stating his intention to either withdraw or pursue his motion to compel.
4
Failure to respond to this order may result in Plaintiff’s case being dismissed for failure to
5
obey a Court order.
6
7
8
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
February 24, 2017
/s/
9
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Michael J. Seng
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?