Blair v. CDCR et al

Filing 60

ORDER ADOPTING 59 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS and ORDER DENYING 57 & 58 Plaintiff's Motions for Injunctive Relief signed by Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 2/23/2017. (Jessen, A)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

PERRY C. BLAIR,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14

v.
CDCR, et al.,

15

Defendants.

16

Case No.: 1:14-cv-01156-LJO-SAB (PC)
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS, AND DENYING
PLAINTIFF’S MOTIONS FOR INJUNCTIVE
RELIEF
[ECF Nos. 57, 58, 59]

Plaintiff Perry C. Blair is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action

17
18

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
On December 9, 2016, the Magistrate Judge issued Findings and Recommendations

19
20

recommending that Plaintiff’s motions for a preliminary injunction and/or temporary restraining order

21

be denied. The Findings and Recommendations were served on the parties and contained notice that

22

objections were to be filed within thirty days. The thirty day time frame has expired and no objections

23

were filed.

24

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), the Court has conducted a de

25

novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the Findings and

26

Recommendation to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

27

///

28

///
1

1

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

2

1.

The Findings and Recommendation, filed on October 29, 2015 is adopted in full; and

3

2.

Plaintiff’s motions for a preliminary injunction and/or temporary restraining order are

4

denied.

5
6
7
8

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

/s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill _____

February 23, 2017

UNITED STATES CHIEF DISTRICT JUDGE

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2