Blair v. CDCR et al
Filing
62
AMENDED ORDER ADOPTING 59 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS IN FULL and ORDER DENYING 57 & 58 Plaintiff's Motions for a Preliminary Injunction and/or Temporary Restraining Order signed by Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 2/24/2017. (Jessen, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
PERRY C. BLAIR,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
v.
CDCR, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
Case No.: 1:14-cv-01156-LJO-SAB (PC)
AMENDED ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS, AND DENYING
PLAINTIFF’S MOTIONS FOR INJUNCTIVE
RELIEF
[ECF Nos. 57, 58, 59]
Plaintiff Perry C. Blair is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action
17
18
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
On December 9, 2016, the Magistrate Judge issued Findings and Recommendations
19
20
recommending that Plaintiff’s motions for a preliminary injunction and/or temporary restraining order
21
be denied. The Findings and Recommendations were served on the parties and contained notice that
22
objections were to be filed within thirty days. The thirty day time frame has expired and no objections
23
were filed.
24
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), the Court has conducted a de
25
novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the Findings and
26
Recommendation to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.
27
///
28
///
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
2
1.
The Findings and Recommendation, filed on December 9, 2016, is adopted in full; and
3
2.
Plaintiff’s motions for a preliminary injunction and/or temporary restraining order are
denied.
4
5
6
7
8
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
/s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill _____
February 24, 2017
UNITED STATES CHIEF DISTRICT JUDGE
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?