Moore v. De La Luz, et al.

Filing 8

Stipulation and Order GRANTING Defendants an extension to file responsive pleading, signed by Magistrate Judge Sandra M. Snyder on 9/5/2014. (Response due by 9/19/2014) (Figueroa, O)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Steven M. Crass #209873 Andrea M. Upton #285733 BAKER MANOCK & JENSEN, PC 5260 North Palm Avenue, Fourth Floor Fresno, California 93704 Telephone: 559.432.5400 Facsimile: 559.432.5620 Attorneys for Defendants FORTINO SERGIO DE LA LUZ, dba RASPADOS EL DIABLITO LOCO; YI MAK, Co-Trustee of the MEI LIN MAK RESIDUAL TRUST CREATED UNDER THE MAK 2006 REVOCABLE TRUST; PIN MAK Co-Trustee of the MEI LIN MAK RESIDUAL TRUST CREATED UNDER THE MAK 2006 REVOCABLE TRUST 8 9 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 13 RONALD MOORE CASE No. 1:14-CV-01159 SMS 14 Plaintiff, 15 STIPULATION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS AN EXTENSION TO FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADING v. 16 17 18 19 20 FORTINO SERGIO DE LA LUZ, dba RASPADOS EL DIABLITO LOCO; YI MAK, Co-Trustee of the MEI LIN MAK RESIDUAL TRUST CREATED UNDER THE MAK 2006 REVOCABLE TRUST; PIN MAK Co-Trustee of the MEI LIN MAK RESIDUAL TRUST CREATED UNDER THE MAK 2006 REVOCABLE TRUST, 21 Defendants. 22 23 24 THE PARTIES, BY AND THROUGH THEIR RESPECTIVE ATTORNEYS OF RECORD, hereby stipulate as follows: 25 1. PIN MAK, co-Trustee of the MEI LIN MAK RESIDUAL TRUST 26 CREATED UNDER THE MAK 2006 REVOCABLE TRUST, was served with the Complaint in 27 the above-captioned matter on August 5, 2014. Accordingly, the original deadline for PIN MAK 28 to file a responsive pleading pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 12 (a)(1)(A) is August 26, 2014. The 1527758v1 STIPULATION GRANTING DEFENDANTS AN EXTENSION TO FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADING 1 parties previously agreed to a 15-day extension for PIN MAK to file his responsive pleading(s). 2 The deadline was therefore extended to September 9, 2014. 3 2. FORTINO SERGIO DE LA LUZ was purportedly served with a copy of 4 the Complaint via substituted service on August 4, 2014. A copy of the complaint was placed in 5 the mail on August 5, 2014. Accordingly, the original deadline for FORTINO SERGIO DE LA 6 LUZ to respond to the Complaint was September 5, 2014. 7 3. No proof of service has been filed as to YI MAK, Co-Trustee of the MEI 8 LIN MAK RESIDUAL TRUST CREATED UNDER THE MAK 2006 REVOCABLE TRUST. 9 Accordingly, the time for YI MAK to file a responsive pleading has not yet begun to run. 10 4. The parties desire to resolve the claims set forth in Plaintiff's Complaint in 11 the above-captioned matter as efficiently as possible, and would like to allow time to attempt to do 12 so without further involvement of the Courts. To that end, the parties have agreed to extend the 13 deadline for PIN MAK and FORTINO SERGIO DE LA LUZ to file a responsive pleading to 14 September 19, 2014. 15 5. The parties agree that this Stipulation may be signed in counterparts and 16 submitted to the court in that manner. The parties also agree that facsimile copies of signatures 17 may be submitted to the Court. 18 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 19 DATED: September 5, 2014 20 BAKER MANOCK & JENSEN, PC 21 By: /s/ Andrea M. Upton Andrea M. Upton Attorneys for Defendants MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C. 22 23 DATED: September 5, 2014 24 25 By: /s/ Tanya E. Moore Tanya E. Moore Attorneys for Plaintiff Ronald Moore 26 27 28 1527758v1 2 STIPULATION GRANTING DEFENDANTS EXTENSION TO FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADING 1 ORDER 2 Having read the Stipulation of the parties and good cause appearing, IT IS 3 HEREBY ORDERED that the deadline for filing responsive pleadings on behalf of PIN MAK and 4 FORTINO SERGIO DE LA LUZ shall be extended to September 19, 2014. 5 6 DATED: September 5, 2014 7 /s/ SANDRA M. SNYDER UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGEE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1527758v1 3 STIPULATION GRANTING DEFENDANTS EXTENSION TO FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADING

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?