Ricker v. Nadal et al

Filing 11

ORDER DENYING Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis and Motion for Appointment of Counsel as MOOT 8 & 10 , signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 8/29/14. (Hellings, J)

1
2
3
4
5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

7
8

PHILLIP T. RICKER,

9

Plaintiff,

10

vs.

11

SGT. A. NADAL, et al.,

12

1:14-cv-01172-LJO-GSA-PC
ORDER DENYING MOTION TO
PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS
AND MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT
OF COUNSEL AS MOOT
(Docs. 8, 10.)

Defendants.

13
14

On July 30, 2014, Phillip T. Ricker ("Plaintiff") filed a motion to proceed in forma

15

pauperis, and on August 6, 2014, Plaintiff filed a motion for appointment of counsel. (Docs. 8,

16

10.) In light of the fact that Plaintiff was denied leave to proceed in forma pauperis and this

17

case was dismissed on July 30, 2014, Plaintiff’s motions are moot.

18

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

19

1.

20
21

Plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis, filed on July 30, 2014, is
DENIED as moot; and

2.

22

Plaintiff’s motion for appointment of counsel, filed on August 6, 2014, is
DENIED as moot.

23
24
25
26
27
28

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

August 29, 2014

/s/ Gary S. Austin
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE