Ramirez v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 14

ORDER REQUIRING Defendant to SHOW CAUSE, in writing, why plaintiff's social security appeal should not be deemed unopposed. Defendant shall, within ten days of service of this order, either file a written response to this order to show cause why Plaintiff's opening brief should not be deemed unopposed or file an opposition to Plaintiff's opening brief. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 7/1/2015. (Rooney, M)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
7

ALICIA RAMIREZ,
Plaintiff,

8
v.

9
10

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL
SECURITY,

Case No. 1:14-cv-1176-SAB
ORDER REQUIRING DEFENDANT TO
SHOW CAUSE WHY PLAINTIFF’S SOCIAL
SECURITY APPEAL SHOULD NOT BE
DEEMED UNOPPOSED
TEN-DAY DEADLINE

11
Defendant.
12
On March 26, 2015, an order issued granting the parties stipulation to extend time for

13

14 briefing.

Pursuant to the stipulation, Plaintiff’s opening brief was due on May 19, 2015;

15 Defendant’s opposition brief was due on June 18, 2015; and Plaintiff’s reply was due July 6,
16 2015. (ECF No. 12.) Plaintiff filed her opening brief on May 20, 2015.

(ECF No. 13.)

17 Although the stipulated date has passed, Defendant has not filed an opposition brief.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, within ten (10) days from the date of

18

19 service of this order, Defendant shall either file a written response to this order to show cause
20 why Plaintiff’s opening brief should not be deemed unopposed or file an opposition to Plaintiff’s
21 opening brief.
22
23

IT IS SO ORDERED.

24 Dated:

July 1, 2015
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

25
26
27
28

1