Hearns v. Gonzales

Filing 66

ORDER Adopting 50 Findings and Recommendations to Deny Plaintiff's 43 Motion for Leave to File a Supplemental Complaint, signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 3/9/17. (Gonzalez, R)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

JAMAR R. HEARNS,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14

No. 1:14-cv-01177-DAD-MJS (PC)

v.
R. GONZALES, et al.,

15

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS TO DENY
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO
FILE A SUPPLEMENTAL COMPLAINT

Defendants.
(Doc. No. 50)

16

Plaintiff is a prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action brought pursuant to 42

17
18

U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

19

§ 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
On November 16, 2016, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and

20
21

recommendations recommending that plaintiff’s July 8, 2016 motion for leave to file a

22

supplemental complaint (Doc. No. 43), be denied. (Doc. No. 50.) Plaintiff was granted fourteen

23

days to file any objections to those findings and recommendations. Id. Despite seeking and

24

receiving an extension of time in which to do so, plaintiff has not submitted any objections, and

25

the time to do so has expired. (See Doc. No. 58.)
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, the

26
27

court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the

28

/////
1

1

court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper

2

analysis.

3

Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that:

4

1. The court adopts the findings and recommendations filed on November 16, 2016

5

(Doc. No. 50) in full; and
2. Plaintiff’s motion for leave to file a supplemental complaint (Doc. No. 43) is

6
7
8
9

DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

March 9, 2017
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2