Brown v. Brown et al
Filing
15
ORDER Denying Plaintiff's Second Motion For Leave To Amend His Complaint As Unnecessary (ECF No. 9 ), signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 10/1/2014. (Fahrney, E)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
RODNEY O’NEAL BROWN,
12
13
Plaintiff,
v.
14
JEFFREY BROWN, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
17
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No.: 1:14-cv-01184-LJO-BAM (PC)
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S SECOND
MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND HIS
COMPLAINT AS UNNECESSARY
(ECF No. 9)
Plaintiff Rodney O’Neal Brown (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma
18
pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff initiated this action on July
19
29, 2014. On August 14, 2014, Plaintiff filed a motion for leave to amend his complaint to reflect the
20
true name of a defendant. (ECF No. 5.) The Court denied the motion as unnecessary because, at the
21
time, Plaintiff was entitled to amend his complaint as a matter of right. (ECF No. 7.)
22
23
24
On September 17, 2014, Plaintiff filed a notice of change of address and a second motion to
amend his complaint to reflect the true names of defendants. (ECF No. 9.)
Despite the Court’s earlier order, Plaintiff did not amend his complaint. Given that Plaintiff
25
has not previously amended his complaint, he may amend once as a matter of right at this stage in the
26
proceedings. Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(1). In other words, Plaintiff may amend his complaint without a
27
court order at this time.
28
1
1
2
Accordingly, as Plaintiff does not need leave of court to file an amended complaint, his motion
is HEREBY DENIED as unnecessary.
3
4
5
6
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
/s/ Barbara
October 1, 2014
A. McAuliffe
_
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?