Brown v. Brown et al

Filing 15

ORDER Denying Plaintiff's Second Motion For Leave To Amend His Complaint As Unnecessary (ECF No. 9 ), signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 10/1/2014. (Fahrney, E)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RODNEY O’NEAL BROWN, 12 13 Plaintiff, v. 14 JEFFREY BROWN, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: 1:14-cv-01184-LJO-BAM (PC) ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S SECOND MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND HIS COMPLAINT AS UNNECESSARY (ECF No. 9) Plaintiff Rodney O’Neal Brown (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma 18 pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff initiated this action on July 19 29, 2014. On August 14, 2014, Plaintiff filed a motion for leave to amend his complaint to reflect the 20 true name of a defendant. (ECF No. 5.) The Court denied the motion as unnecessary because, at the 21 time, Plaintiff was entitled to amend his complaint as a matter of right. (ECF No. 7.) 22 23 24 On September 17, 2014, Plaintiff filed a notice of change of address and a second motion to amend his complaint to reflect the true names of defendants. (ECF No. 9.) Despite the Court’s earlier order, Plaintiff did not amend his complaint. Given that Plaintiff 25 has not previously amended his complaint, he may amend once as a matter of right at this stage in the 26 proceedings. Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(1). In other words, Plaintiff may amend his complaint without a 27 court order at this time. 28 1 1 2 Accordingly, as Plaintiff does not need leave of court to file an amended complaint, his motion is HEREBY DENIED as unnecessary. 3 4 5 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: /s/ Barbara October 1, 2014 A. McAuliffe _ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?