Hunter v. McBride et al

Filing 9

ORDER to SHOW CAUSE Why Action Should Not Be Dismissed for Failure to Comply With a Court Order signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 1/6/2015. Show Cause Response due within thirty (30) days. (Jessen, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JESSE HUNTER, 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 McBRIDE, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 Case No.: 1:14-cv-01192-SAB (PC) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ACTION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH A COURT ORDER [ECF No. 8] Plaintiff Jesse Hunter is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action 17 18 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On November 18, 2014, the Court dismissed Plaintiff’s complaint, with leave to amend, for 19 20 failure to state a cognizable claim for relief. The thirty day time frame to file an amended complaint 21 has expired and Plaintiff has not complied with or otherwise responded to the Court’s order. As a 22 result, there is no pleading on file which sets forth any claims upon which relief may be granted under 23 section 1983. 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 1 Accordingly, within thirty (30) days from the date of service of this order, Plaintiff shall show 1 2 cause in writing why the action should not be dismissed for failure to comply with a court order. 3 Failure to respond to this order will result in dismissal of the action. Local Rule 110. 4 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 Dated: 7 January 6, 2015 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?