Moore v. Namroud Investment, LLC et al

Filing 21

ORDER on Stipulation for Dismissal of Action, signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 1/15/15: This action is dismissed with prejudice in its entirety. Each party shall bear its own attorney's fees and costs. (CASE CLOSED)(Hellings, J)

1
2
3
4
5
6

Tanya E. Moore, SBN 206683
MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C.
332 North Second Street
San Jose, California 95112
Telephone [phone]
Facsimile [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Ronald Moore

7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

RONALD MOORE,

12
13
14
15
16
17

Plaintiff,
vs.
NAMROUD INVESTMENT, LLC, et al.,
Defendants.

) No. 1:14-cv-01198---SAB
)
) STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF
) ACTION; ORDER
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF ACTION; ORDER
Page 1

1

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff Ronald Moore and Defendants

2

Namroud Investment, LLC, and Mam Oil, Inc., dba Arco am/pm #82423, the parties to this

3

action, by and through their respective counsel, that pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure

4

41(a)(1)(A)(ii), the above-captioned action be dismissed with prejudice in its entirety. Each

5

party is to bear its own attorneys’ fees and costs.

6
7

Date: January 13, 2015

MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C.

8
/s/ Tanya E. Moore
Tanya E. Moore
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Ronald Moore

9
10
11
12

Date: January 13, 2015

BLEAU FOX, A P.L.C.

13
/s/ Megan A. Childress
Megan A. Childress
Attorneys for Defendants
Namroud Investment, LLC, and Mam Oil, Inc., dba
Arco am/pm #82423

14
15
16
17

ORDER

18
19
20

The parties having so stipulated,

21

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action be dismissed with prejudice in its entirety.

22

Each party shall bear its own attorney’s fees and costs.

23

SO ORDERED
Dated: January 15, 2015

24
25

/s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill
United States District Judge

26
27
28

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF ACTION; ORDER
Page 2