Hamilton v. Quinonez et al
Filing
21
ORDER Adopting 20 Findings and Recommendations to: 1) Deny Request for Entry of Default, 2) Grant in Part and Deny in Part Plaintiff's 18 Motion to Strike Defendants' Affirmative Defenses, signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 4/8/15. (Verduzco, M)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8
EDDIE HAMILTON,
9
10
11
Plaintiff,
CASE NO. 1:14-cv-1216-LJO-MJS (PC)
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS
RECOMMENDATIONS TO:
AND
v.
J. QUINONEZ, et al.,
12
Defendants.
13
14
15
1) DENY REQUEST FOR ENTRY OF
DEFAULT
2) GRANT IN PART AND DENY IN PART
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO STRIKE
DEFENDANTS’ AFFIRMATIVE
DEFENSES
(ECF NO. 20)
16
CASE TO REMAIN OPEN
17
18
19
Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil
20
rights action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (ECF Nos. 1 & 9.) The action
21
proceeds on Plaintiff’s Eight Amendment failure to protect claim against Defendants
22
Quinonez and Lozano. (ECF Nos. 9 & 10.)
23
24
25
On March 17, 2017, the Magistrate Judge issued findings and recommendations
to deny Plaintiff’s request for entry of default and to grant in part and deny in part
Plaintiff’s motion to strike. (ECF No. 20.) Neither Plaintiff nor Defendants have filed
26
27
28
objections.
1
2
3
Before this Court is Plaintiff’s “Motion to Strike Defendant’s [sic] Answer and
Affirmative Defenses to Complaint.” (ECF No. 18.)
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), the Court has
4
conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the
5
6
7
Court finds the Findings and Recommendation to be supported by the record and by
proper analysis.
8
Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that:
9
1.
10
11
The Court adopts the Findings and Recommendation filed on March 17,
2015 (ECF No. 20) in full; and
2.
The case is to remain open.
12
13
14
15
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
/s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill
April 8, 2015
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?