Healy v. Taft Federal Correctional Institution, et al.

Filing 13

AMENDED ORDER re 11 Stipulation to Extend Time to Respond to Complaint and Continue Scheduling Conference, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 11/12/2014. Status Conference re Consent / Initial Scheduling Conference CONTINUED to 2/23/2015 at 09:00 AM in Bakersfield at 510 19th Street (JLT) before Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston. (Hall, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney ALYSON A. BERG Assistant United States Attorney 2500 Tulare Street, Suite 4401 Fresno, California 93721 Telephone: (559) 497-4000 Facsimile: (559) 497-4099 5 6 Attorneys for Defendant UNITED STATES 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DANIEL HEALY, 11 Plaintiff, 12 v. 13 TAFT FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, MANAGEMENT & TRAINING CORPORATION, 14 15 Defendants. 16 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 1:14−CV−01224 JLT STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT AND CONTINUE SCHEDULING CONFERENCE; AMENDED ORDER (Doc. 11) Plaintiff Daniel Healy (“Plaintiff”), Defendants United States of America (“United States”)1, and 17 18 Management & Training Corporation (“MTC”) (collectively “the parties”) stipulate, by and through the 19 undersigned counsel, to extend the deadline for the United States and MTC to respond to the complaint 20 to and including December 15, 2014. The parties further agree to continue the date of the scheduling conference currently set for 21 22 November 18, 2014 at 9:00 a.m. before Magistrate Judge Thurston in Bakersfield, California to 23 February 13, 2015 at 9:00 a.m. before Magistrate Judge Thurston in Bakersfield, California. 24 /// 25 26 27 28 1 The United States is the only proper federal defendant because federal agencies cannot be sued for tort claims. See FDIC v. Meyer, 510 U.S. 471, 476 (1994); see also Pink v. Modoc Indian Health Project, Inc., 157 F.3d 1185, 1188 (9th Cir. 1998) (“Congress did not expressly authorize suits against federal agencies under the Federal Tort Claims Act.”). 29 30 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT AND CONTINUE SCHEDULING CONFERENCE; ORDER 1 1 2 3 The parties base this stipulation on good cause, which includes the need for United States to review the allegations in the Complaint and respond accordingly. Accordingly, the parties stipulate and agree to continue the time for the United States and MTC 4 to file a responsive pleading to the Complaint and the scheduling conference as specified below, and 5 base it on the above-stated good cause. The parties request the court to endorse this stipulation by way 6 of formal order. Old Date New Date November 21, 2014 December 15, 2014 8 Defendants’ response to Complaint (United States and MTC) 9 Scheduling Conference November 18, 2014 February 13, 2015 @9:00 7 10 Respectfully submitted, 11 12 Dated: November 5, 2014 13 /s/Alyson A. Berg Alyson A. Berg Assistant United States Attorney Attorney for Defendant United States of America 14 15 16 BENJAMIN B. WAGNER UNITED STATES ATTORNEY Dated: November 5, 2014 WELEBIR, TIERNEY & WEEK, APLC (As authorized 11/05/2014) 17 /s/Douglas Welebir Douglas Welebir Attorneys for Plaintiff Daniel Healy 18 19 20 21 22 Dated: November 4, 2014 BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSEN LLP (As authorized 11/04/2014) /s/Susan E. Coleman Susan E. Coleman Attorney for Defendant Management & Training Corporation (MTC) 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT AND CONTINUE SCHEDULING CONFERENCE; ORDER 2 ORDER 1 2 Having reviewed the stipulation submitted by the parties, the court hereby extends the time for 3 the United States and MTC to respond to the complaint to December 15, 2014. The scheduling 4 conference currently set for November 18, 2014 is continued to February 23, 2015 at 9:00 a.m. 5 6 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: November 12, 2014 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT AND CONTINUE SCHEDULING CONFERENCE; ORDER 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?