Valiterra v. City of Arvin et al
Filing
29
STIPULATION and ORDER 27 amending 24 Pretrial Scheduling Order signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 12/8/2015. All Non-Expert Discovery to be completed by 6/3/2016. Expert Witness Disclosures to be made by 7/5/2016. Supplemental Disclosures and Disc losures of any Rebuttal Experts are due by 7/22/2016. All Dispositive Motions shall be filed by 8/22/2016. Final Pretrial Conference is CONTINUED to 11/18/2016 at 10:00 AM and Jury Trial is RE-SCHEDULED for 1/9/2017 at 9:00 AM in Courtroom 6 (JAM). Joint Pre-Trial Statement to be filed on 11/11/2016. (Marciel, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
Malosack Berjis (SBN 282576)
LAW OFFICE OF MALOSACK BERJIS
445 South Figueroa Street, 27th Floor
Los Angeles, California 90071-1602
Telephone: (213) 293-9491
Facsimile: (213) 293-9497
malosack@lawyer.com
Attorney for Plaintiff
EUGENE ANTHONY ROSSEL
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
23
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
CITY OF ARVIN, a public entity;
)
)
CHIEF OF POLICE LOUIS A.
)
COBARRUVIAZ, in his individual and )
official capacities; OFFICER DANIEL )
BRAVO (#919), in his individual and )
)
official capacities; SERGEANT JERRY )
)
MARTINEZ, in his individual and
)
official capacities; and, DOES 1 to 10, )
)
inclusive,
)
)
Defendants.
)
///
24
///
25
///
26
///
27
///
28
///
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
ALICIA MARIA VALTIERRA,
CASE NO. 1:14-cv-01228-JAM-JLT
Assigned to the Honorable John A.
Mendez
ORDER FOR AMENDMENT OF
PRE-TRIAL SCHEDULING
ORDER OF DECEMBER 18, 2014
Action Filed:
Trial Date:
August 5, 2014
August 1, 2016
________________________ __________ __ _____________1__________________ __________________ _____________
[PROPOSED] ORDER FOR AMENDMENT OF PRE-TRIAL
SCHEDULING ORDER OF DECEMBER 18, 2014
1
Having considered the Stipulation for Amendment of Pre-Trial Scheduling
2
Order of December 18, 2014, executed by the parties and filed herewith, and
3
finding good cause therefor,
4
5
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
6
1.
7
The Pre-Trial Scheduling Order of December 18, 2014 shall be
amended to have non-expert discovery be completed by June 3, 2016;
8
9
2.
10
The Pre-Trial Scheduling Order of December 18, 2014 shall be
11
amended to have expert witness disclosures, under Federal Rule of
12
Civil Procedure 26(a)(2), be made by July 5, 2016;
13
3.
14
The Pre-Trial Scheduling Order of December 18, 2014 shall be
15
amended to have supplemental disclosures and disclosures of any
16
rebuttal experts, under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(2)(C),
17
be made by July 22, 2016;
18
4.
19
The Pre-Trial Scheduling Order of December 18, 2014 shall be
amended to have expert discovery be completed by August 22, 2016;
20
21
5.
22
The Pre-Trial Scheduling Order of December 18, 2014 shall be
amended to have all dispositive motions be filed by August 23, 2016;
23
24
6.
25
The Pre-Trial Scheduling Order of December 18, 2014 shall be
26
amended to have hearing on dispositive motions be on September 20,
27
2016 at 1:30 p.m.;
28
///
________________________ __________ __ _____________2__________________ __________________ _____________
[PROPOSED] ORDER FOR AMENDMENT OF PRE-TRIAL
SCHEDULING ORDER OF DECEMBER 18, 2014
1
7.
The Pre-Trial Scheduling Order of December 18, 2014 shall be
2
amended to have a joint pre-trial statement be filed on November 11,
3
2016;
4
5
8.
The Pre-Trial Scheduling Order of December 18, 2014 shall be
6
amended to have the final pre-trial conference be on November 18,
7
2016 at 10:00 a.m.; and
8
9
10
9.
The Pre-Trial Scheduling Order of December 18, 2014 shall be
amended to have the jury trial be set for January 9, 2017 at 9:00 a.m.
11
12
IT IS SO ORDERED.
13
14
15
Dated: 12/8/2015
/s/ John A. Mendez____________
Honorable John A. Mendez
United States District Court Judge
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
________________________ __________ __ _____________3__________________ __________________ _____________
[PROPOSED] ORDER FOR AMENDMENT OF PRE-TRIAL
SCHEDULING ORDER OF DECEMBER 18, 2014
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?