Valiterra v. City of Arvin et al

Filing 29

STIPULATION and ORDER 27 amending 24 Pretrial Scheduling Order signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 12/8/2015. All Non-Expert Discovery to be completed by 6/3/2016. Expert Witness Disclosures to be made by 7/5/2016. Supplemental Disclosures and Disc losures of any Rebuttal Experts are due by 7/22/2016. All Dispositive Motions shall be filed by 8/22/2016. Final Pretrial Conference is CONTINUED to 11/18/2016 at 10:00 AM and Jury Trial is RE-SCHEDULED for 1/9/2017 at 9:00 AM in Courtroom 6 (JAM). Joint Pre-Trial Statement to be filed on 11/11/2016. (Marciel, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 Malosack Berjis (SBN 282576) LAW OFFICE OF MALOSACK BERJIS 445 South Figueroa Street, 27th Floor Los Angeles, California 90071-1602 Telephone: (213) 293-9491 Facsimile: (213) 293-9497 malosack@lawyer.com Attorney for Plaintiff EUGENE ANTHONY ROSSEL 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 23 ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) CITY OF ARVIN, a public entity; ) ) CHIEF OF POLICE LOUIS A. ) COBARRUVIAZ, in his individual and ) official capacities; OFFICER DANIEL ) BRAVO (#919), in his individual and ) ) official capacities; SERGEANT JERRY ) ) MARTINEZ, in his individual and ) official capacities; and, DOES 1 to 10, ) ) inclusive, ) ) Defendants. ) /// 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 ALICIA MARIA VALTIERRA, CASE NO. 1:14-cv-01228-JAM-JLT Assigned to the Honorable John A. Mendez ORDER FOR AMENDMENT OF PRE-TRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER OF DECEMBER 18, 2014 Action Filed: Trial Date: August 5, 2014 August 1, 2016 ________________________ __________ __ _____________1__________________ __________________ _____________ [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR AMENDMENT OF PRE-TRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER OF DECEMBER 18, 2014 1 Having considered the Stipulation for Amendment of Pre-Trial Scheduling 2 Order of December 18, 2014, executed by the parties and filed herewith, and 3 finding good cause therefor, 4 5 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 6 1. 7 The Pre-Trial Scheduling Order of December 18, 2014 shall be amended to have non-expert discovery be completed by June 3, 2016; 8 9 2. 10 The Pre-Trial Scheduling Order of December 18, 2014 shall be 11 amended to have expert witness disclosures, under Federal Rule of 12 Civil Procedure 26(a)(2), be made by July 5, 2016; 13 3. 14 The Pre-Trial Scheduling Order of December 18, 2014 shall be 15 amended to have supplemental disclosures and disclosures of any 16 rebuttal experts, under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(2)(C), 17 be made by July 22, 2016; 18 4. 19 The Pre-Trial Scheduling Order of December 18, 2014 shall be amended to have expert discovery be completed by August 22, 2016; 20 21 5. 22 The Pre-Trial Scheduling Order of December 18, 2014 shall be amended to have all dispositive motions be filed by August 23, 2016; 23 24 6. 25 The Pre-Trial Scheduling Order of December 18, 2014 shall be 26 amended to have hearing on dispositive motions be on September 20, 27 2016 at 1:30 p.m.; 28 /// ________________________ __________ __ _____________2__________________ __________________ _____________ [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR AMENDMENT OF PRE-TRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER OF DECEMBER 18, 2014 1 7. The Pre-Trial Scheduling Order of December 18, 2014 shall be 2 amended to have a joint pre-trial statement be filed on November 11, 3 2016; 4 5 8. The Pre-Trial Scheduling Order of December 18, 2014 shall be 6 amended to have the final pre-trial conference be on November 18, 7 2016 at 10:00 a.m.; and 8 9 10 9. The Pre-Trial Scheduling Order of December 18, 2014 shall be amended to have the jury trial be set for January 9, 2017 at 9:00 a.m. 11 12 IT IS SO ORDERED. 13 14 15 Dated: 12/8/2015 /s/ John A. Mendez____________ Honorable John A. Mendez United States District Court Judge 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ________________________ __________ __ _____________3__________________ __________________ _____________ [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR AMENDMENT OF PRE-TRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER OF DECEMBER 18, 2014

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?