Hornsby II v. County of Tulare, California et al

Filing 30

STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING HEARING ON DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND SETTING BRIEFING SCHDULE signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on March 29, 2016. 27 MOTION for SUMMARY JUDGMENT currently set for 4/1/2016 has been CONTINUED to 4/15/2016 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 10 (EPG) before Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean. (Munoz, I)

1
2
3
4
5

WILLIAM A. ROMAINE, #126966
Law Office of William A. Romaine
206 West Lacey Boulevard #309
Hanford, CA 93230
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
E-mail: [e-mail]

6

Attorneys for Plaintiffs
7

8
9
10
11
12
13
14

KATHLEEN BALES-LANGE, #094765
County Counsel for the County of Tulare
JUDITH D. CHAPMAN, #169479
Deputy County Counsel
2900 West Burrel, County Civic Center
Visalia, California 93291
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
E-mail: [e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendants County of Tulare and Tulare County Sheriff’s Department

15

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

16
17
18

TED HORNSBY II.
Plaintiffs,

19
20

Case Number: 1:14-cv-01236 EPG

vs.

21
22
23
24
25

COUNTY OF TULARE, CALIFORNIA,
JOSEPH ENGLAND, BRADLEY MCLEAN,
JOSEPH CAMPOS, AND BILL WITTMAN
IN HIS CAPACITY AS SHERIFF, COUNTY
OF TULARE, CALIFORNIA
Defendants.

26

///

27

STIPULATION AND ORDER
CONTINUING HEARING ON
DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND
SETTING BRIEFING SCHDULE

///

28
1

STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING HEARING ON MOTION - 1

1

BY AND THROUGH THEIR RESPECTIVE ATTORNEYS OF RECORD, the

2

parties hereto do hereby stipulate that the hearing on defendants’ motion for summary

3

judgment, currently scheduled to be heard on April 1, 2016 in the above-entitled court may,

4

for cause shown by the Declaration of William A. Romaine, attached hereto as Exhibit A and

5

incorporated herein by this reference, be continued to be heard on April 15, 2016 at the hour

6

of 10:00 AM in Courtroom 10 of the above-entitled court.

7

At the court’s pleasure, based upon its determination of cause, Plaintiff and opposing

8

party shall electronically serve and file any opposition to the motion for summary judgment

9

on or before March 25, 2016, or March 28, 2016 and defendants may receive equal time and

10

electronically serve and file any reply to said opposition on or before April 8, 2016, or April

11

11, 2016.

12

It is so stipulated.

13
14

Dated: March 25, 2016

Kathleen Bales-Lange, Tulare County Counsel

15

By: _______s/Judith Chapman________________
Judith Chapman, Deputy, Attorney for Defendants

16
17
18

Dated March 25, 2016

Law Office of William A. Romaine

19

By:_________s/ William A. Romaine___________
William A. Romaine, Attorney for Plaintiff

20
21

///

22
23
24

///
///

25
26
27
28
2

STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING HEARING ON MOTION - 2

ORDER

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

Based on the above stipulation, the Court continues the hearing on Defendants’
Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 27), currently set for April 1, 2016 at 10:00 a.m.,
to April 15, 2016 at 10:00 a.m. Briefing for the Motion shall be filed in accordance with
Local Rule 230 and Defendants’ reply may be filed no later than April 8, 2016. Plaintiff’s
opposition to the Motion, which was filed on March 28, 2016, is deemed timely filed.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

8
9

Dated:

March 29, 2016

/s/
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3

STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING HEARING ON MOTION - 3