Smith v. City of Modesto et al
Filing
28
Order Continuing Pre-Trial Dates, signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 07/27/2015. (Yu, L)
1
5
.3
Susan E. Coleman (SBN 171832)
E-mail: scoleman@bwslaw.com
Nathan A. Oyster (SBN 225307)
E-mail: noyster@bwslaw.com
BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSEN, LLP
444 South Flower Street, Suite 2400
Los Angeles, CA 90071-2953
Tel: 213.236.0600; Fax: 213.236.2700
6
Attorneys for Defendants
7
Attorneys for Defendants
CITY OF MODESTO, OFFICER DAVID
WATSON and OFFICER RANDALL W.
BOLINGER
2
3
4
8
9
10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
12
13
JACK SMITH,
14
Case No. 1:14-cv-01285-LJO-MJS
Plaintiff,
ORDER CONTINUING PRE-TRIAL
DATES
15
v.
16
CITY OF MODESTO, a municipal
corporation; Modesto Police
Department Officers DAVID
WATSON (#11078) and RANDALL
W. BOLINGER (#10069),
individually; and DOES 1 through
50, Jointly and Severally,
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
B URKE , W ILLIAMS &
S ORENS EN , LLP
ATTO RNEY S AT LAW
LOS A NG EL ES
Hon. Michael J. Seng
Defendants.
GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, based on the stipulation of the parties:
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the following deadlines are modified:
Deadline
Prior Date
New Date
Non-Expert Discovery
September 14, 2015
November 16, 2015
Expert Discovery
November 30, 2015
January 29, 2016
Expert Disclosure
October 13, 2015
December 14, 2015
Supp. Expert Disclosure
November 17, 2015
January 11, 2016
CAPTION 1:14-CV-01285-LJO-MJS
[PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING PRETRIAL DATES
1
2
The motion deadlines, pre-trial, and trial dates set forth in the Court’s
Scheduling Order [Doc. No. 16] remain unchanged.
3
4
5
6
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
July 27, 2015
/s/
Michael J. Seng
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
B URKE , W ILLIAMS &
S ORENS EN , LLP
ATTO RNEY S AT LAW
LOS A NG EL ES
-2-
CAPTION 1:14-CV-01285-LJO-MJS
[PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING PRETRIAL DATES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?