Smith v. City of Modesto et al

Filing 32

ORDER DISMISSING This Action With Prejudice, signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 11/25/15. CASE CLOSED. (Marrujo, C)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Susan E. Coleman (SBN 171832) E-mail: scoleman@bwslaw.com Nathan A. Oyster (SBN 225307) E-mail: noyster@bwslaw.com Christopher T. Kim (SBN 279214) E-mail: ckim@bwslaw.com BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSEN, LLP 444 South Flower Street, Suite 2400 Los Angeles, CA 90071-2953 Tel: 213.236.0600; Fax: 213.236.2700 Attorneys for Defendants CITY OF MODESTO, OFFICER DAVID WATSON and OFFICER RANDALL W. BOLINGER 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 JACK SMITH, 13 Case No. 1:14-cv-01285-LJO-MJS Plaintiff, 14 v. 15 CITY OF MODESTO, a municipal corporation; Modesto Police Department Officers DAVID WATSON (#11078) and RANDALL W. BOLINGER (#10069), individually; and DOES 1 through 50, Jointly and Severally, 16 17 18 19 ORDER DISMISSING THIS ACTION WITH PREJUDICE [FED. R. CIV P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii)] [Joint Stipulation filed concurrently herewith] Hon. Lawrence J. O’Neill Defendants. 20 21 /// 22 /// 23 /// 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// LA #4822-5682-8715 v1 ORDER DISMISSING THIS ACTION WITH PREJUDICE 1 Pursuant to the Joint Stipulation To Dismiss This Action With Prejudice filed 2 by Plaintiff Jack Smith and Defendants City of Modesto, Officer David Watson, 3 and Officer Randall W. Bolinger, and Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 4 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the entire action including all 5 claims against Defendants City of Modesto, Officer David Watson, and Officer 6 Randall W. Bolinger is dismissed with prejudice. Each party is to bear their own 7 attorneys’ fees and costs. 8 9 10 IT IS SO ORDERED Dated: November 25, 2015 /s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill United States District Judge 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 LA #4822-5682-8715 v1 -2- CASE NO. 1:14-CV-01285-LJO-MJS ORDER DISMISSING THIS ACTION WITH PREJUDICE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?