Handy v. LogMeIn, Inc.

Filing 4

ORDER CONTINUING Status Conference re Consent / Scheduling Conference, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 11/19/2014. Status Conference re Consent / Initial Scheduling Conference CONTINUED to 1/26/2015 at 09:30 AM in Bakersfield at 510 19th Street (JLT) before Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston. (Hall, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DARREN HANDY, Plaintiff, 12 13 v. 14 LOGMEIN, INC., Defendant. 15 ) Case No.: 1:14-cv-01355 --- JLT ) ) ORDER CONTINUING STATUS CONFERENCE ) RE: CONSENT/SCHEDULING CONFERENCE ) ) ) ) ) 16 17 On August 28, 2014, Plaintiff filed the instant action. (Doc. 1) On the same day, the Court 18 issued the summons (Doc. 2) and its order setting the mandatory scheduling conference to occur on 19 December 17, 2014. (Doc. 4) In its order setting the mandatory scheduling conference, the Court 20 advised counsel: The Court is unable to conduct a scheduling conference until defendants have been served with the summons and complaint. Accordingly, plaintiff(s) shall diligently pursue service of summons and complaint and dismiss those defendants against whom plaintiff(s) will not pursue claims. Plaintiff(s) shall promptly file proofs of service of the summons and complaint so the Court has a record of service. Counsel are referred to F.R.Civ.P., Rule 4 regarding the requirement of timely service of the complaint. Failure to timely serve summons and complaint may result in the imposition of sanctions, including the dismissal of unserved defendants. 21 22 23 24 25 26 (Doc. 4 at 1-2, emphasis added) Nevertheless, Plaintiff has not filed a proof of service of the 27 summons and complaint and no defendant has appeared in the action. 28 /// 1 1 Therefore, the Court ORDERS, 2 1. 3 January 26, 2015 at 9:30 a.m. at the United States Courthouse at 510 19th Street, Bakersfield, CA. Plaintiff is reminded of the service obligations under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4.1 Failure to comply 4 5 The scheduling conference, currently set on December 17, 2014, is continued to may result in the imposition of sanctions, including the dismissal of unserved defendants. 6 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. 8 Dated: November 19, 2014 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m) requires the Court sua sponte to dismiss defendants who have not been served within 120 days of the filing of the complaint unless good cause is shown. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?