J & J Sports Productions, Inc. v. Jens et al

Filing 12

SCHEDULING ORDER, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 12/16/2014. Consent/Decline Deadline 12/26/2014. Pleading Amendment Deadline 3/13/2015. Discovery Deadlines: Initial Disclosures 12/26/2014; Non-Expert 5/15/2015; Expert 6/19/2015. Non-Dispositive Motion Deadlines: Filed by 6/26/2015; Hearing by 7/24/2015. Dispositive Motion Deadlines: Filed by 8/7/2015; Hearing by 9/29/2015. Pretrial Conference set for 11/17/2015 at 08:30 AM in Courtroom 4 (LJO) before District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill. Jury Trial set for 1/12/2016 at 08:30 AM in Courtroom 4 (LJO) before District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill. (Hall, S)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9
10

J & J SPORTS PRODUCTION, INC.,

11

Plaintiff,
v.

12
13

JASON PAUL JENS, et al.,
Defendants.

14
15

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

1: 14-CV-01359 - LJO - JLT
SCHEDULING ORDER (Fed. R. Civ. P. 16)
Pleading Amendment Deadline: 3/13/2015
Discovery Deadlines:
Initial Disclosures: 12/26/2014
Non Expert: 5/15/2015
Expert: 6/19/2015

16

Non-Dispositive Motion Deadlines:
Filing: 6/26/2015
Hearing: 7/24/2015

17
18

Dispositive Motion Deadlines:
Filing: 8/7/2015
Hearing: 9/29/2015

19
20
21

Pre-Trial Conference:
11/17/2015 at 8:30 a.m.
Courtroom 4

22
23

Trial:
24
25
26

I.

December 16, 2014.

27
28

Date of Scheduling Conference

///

1

1/12/2016 at 8:30 a.m.
Courtroom 4
Jury trial: 2-3 days

1

II.

Appearances of Counsel

2

Thomas Peter Riley, Jr. appeared on behalf of Plaintiff.

3

Matthew Pare appeared on behalf of Defendant.

4

III.

Magistrate Judge Consent:

5

Notice of Congested Docket and Court Policy of Trailing

6

Due to the District Judges’ heavy caseload, the newly adopted policy of the Fresno Division of

7

the Eastern District is to trail all civil cases. The parties are hereby notified that for a trial date set

8

before a District Judge, the parties will trail indefinitely behind any higher priority criminal or older

9

civil case set on the same date until a courtroom becomes available. The trial date will not be reset to a

10

continued date.
The Magistrate Judges’ availability is far more realistic and accommodating to parties than that

11
12

of the U.S. District Judges who carry the heaviest caseloads in the nation and who must prioritize

13

criminal and older civil cases over more recently filed civil cases. A United States Magistrate Judge

14

may conduct trials, including entry of final judgment, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), Federal Rule of

15

Civil Procedure 73, and Local Rule 305. Any appeal from a judgment entered by a United States

16

Magistrate Judge is taken directly to the United States Court of Appeal for the Ninth Circuit.
The Fresno Division of the Eastern District of California, whenever possible, is utilizing United

17
18

States Article III District Court Judges from throughout the nation as Visiting Judges. Pursuant to the

19

Local Rules, Appendix A, such reassignments will be random, and the parties will receive no advance

20

notice before their case is reassigned to an Article III District Court Judge from outside of the Eastern

21

District of California.
Therefore, the parties are directed to consider consenting to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction to

22
23

conduct all further proceedings, including trial. Within 10 days of the date of this order, counsel

24

SHALL file a consent/decline form (provided by the Court at the inception of this case) indicating

25

whether they will consent to the jurisdiction of the Magistrate Judge.

26

IV.

27
28

Pleading Amendment Deadline
Any requested pleading amendments are ordered to be filed, either through a stipulation or

motion to amend, no later than March 13, 2015.

2

1
2
3
4
5
6

V.

Discovery Plan and Cut-Off Date
The parties are ordered to exchange the initial disclosures required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1)

on or before December 26, 2014.
The parties are ordered to complete all discovery pertaining to non-experts on or before May
15, 2015, and all discovery pertaining to experts on or before June 19, 2015.
The parties are directed to disclose all expert witnesses, in writing, on or before May 1, 2015,

7

and to disclose all rebuttal experts on or before May 22, 2015. The written designation of retained and

8

non-retained experts shall be made pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. Rule 26(a)(2), (A), (B), and (C) and

9

shall include all information required thereunder. Failure to designate experts in compliance with

10

this order may result in the Court excluding the testimony or other evidence offered through such

11

experts that are not disclosed pursuant to this order.

12

The provisions of Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(b)(4) and (5) shall apply to all discovery relating to experts

13

and their opinions. Experts must be fully prepared to be examined on all subjects and opinions

14

included in the designation. Failure to comply will result in the imposition of sanctions, which may

15

include striking the expert designation and preclusion of expert testimony.

16
17

The provisions of Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(e) regarding a party's duty to timely supplement
disclosures and responses to discovery requests will be strictly enforced.

18

VI.

Pre-Trial Motion Schedule

19

All non-dispositive pre-trial motions, including any discovery motions, shall be filed no later

20

than June 26, 2015, and heard on or before July 24, 2015. Non-dispositive motions are heard before

21

the Honorable Jennifer L. Thurston, United States Magistrate Judge at the United States Courthouse in

22

Bakersfield, California.

23

No written discovery motions shall be filed without the prior approval of the assigned

24

Magistrate Judge. A party with a discovery dispute must first confer with the opposing party in a good

25

faith effort to resolve by agreement the issues in dispute. If that good faith effort is unsuccessful, the

26

moving party promptly shall seek a telephonic hearing with all involved parties and the Magistrate

27

Judge. It shall be the obligation of the moving party to arrange and originate the conference call to the

28

court. To schedule this telephonic hearing, the parties are ordered to contact Courtroom Deputy Clerk,

3

1

Susan Hall at [phone] or via email at [e-mail]. Counsel must comply with

2

Local Rule 251 with respect to discovery disputes or the motion will be denied without prejudice

3

and dropped from calendar.
In scheduling such motions, the Magistrate Judge may grant applications for an order shortening

4
5

time pursuant to Local Rule 144(e). However, if counsel does not obtain an order shortening time, the

6

notice of motion must comply with Local Rule 251.
Counsel may appear and argue non-dispositive motions via CourtCall, providing a written

7
8

request to so appear is made to the Magistrate Judge's Courtroom Clerk no later than five court days

9

before the noticed hearing date.
All dispositive pre-trial motions shall be filed no later than August 7, 2015, and heard no later

10
11

than September 29, 2015, in Courtroom 4 at 8:30 a.m. before the Honorable Lawrence J. O'Neill,

12

United States District Court Judge. In scheduling such motions, counsel shall comply with Fed. R.

13

Civ. P. 56 and Local Rules 230 and 260.

14

VII.

Motions for Summary Judgment or Summary Adjudication

15

At least 21 days before filing a motion for summary judgment or motion for summary

16

adjudication, the parties are ORDERED to meet, in person or by telephone, to confer about the issues

17

to be raised in the motion.

18

The purpose of the meeting shall be to: 1) avoid filing motions for summary judgment where

19

a question of fact exists; 2) determine whether the respondent agrees that the motion has merit in

20

whole or in part; 3) discuss whether issues can be resolved without the necessity of briefing; 4)

21

narrow the issues for review by the court; 5) explore the possibility of settlement before the parties

22

incur the expense of briefing a summary judgment motion; 6) to arrive at a joint statement of

23

undisputed facts.

24

The moving party shall initiate the meeting and SHALL provide a complete, proposed

25

statement of undisputed facts at least five days before the conference. The finalized joint statement

26

of undisputed facts SHALL include all facts that the parties agree, for purposes of the motion, may

27

be deemed true. In addition to the requirements of Local Rule 260, the moving party shall file

28

the joint statement of undisputed facts.

4

In the notice of motion the moving party shall certify that the parties have met and conferred as

1
2

ordered above, or set forth a statement of good cause for the failure to meet and confer.

3

VIII. Pre-Trial Conference Date

4

November 17, 2015 at 8:30 a.m. in Courtroom 4 before Judge O'Neill.

5

The parties are ordered to file a Joint Pretrial Statement pursuant to Local Rule 281(a)(2).

6

The parties are further directed to submit a digital copy of their pretrial statement in Word format,

7

directly to Judge O'Neill's chambers, by email at [e-mail].
Counsels' attention is directed to Rules 281 and 282 of the Local Rules of Practice for the

8
9

Eastern District of California, as to the obligations of counsel in preparing for the pre-trial conference.

10

The Court will insist upon strict compliance with those rules. In addition to the matters set forth in the

11

Local Rules the Joint Pretrial Statement shall include a Joint Statement of the case to be used by the

12

Court to explain the nature of the case to the jury during voir dire.

13

IX.

January 12, 2016 at 8:30 a.m. in Courtroom 4 before the Honorable Lawrence J. O'Neill,

14
15

Trial Date

United States District Court Judge.

16

A.

This is a jury trial.

17

B.

Counsels' Estimate of Trial Time: 2-3 days.

18

C.

Counsels' attention is directed to Local Rules of Practice for the Eastern District of

19

California, Rule 285.

20

X.

21

Settlement Conference
If the parties believe the matter is in a settlement posture and desire a settlement conference,

22

they may file a joint request that the Court schedule a settlement conference.

23

XI.

Request for Bifurcation, Appointment of Special Master, or other

24

Techniques to Shorten Trial

25

Not applicable at this time.

26

XII.

There are no pending related matters.

27
28

Related Matters Pending

///

5

1

XIII. Compliance with Federal Procedure
All counsel are expected to familiarize themselves with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure

2
3

and the Local Rules of Practice of the Eastern District of California, and to keep abreast of any

4

amendments thereto. The Court must insist upon compliance with these Rules if it is to efficiently

5

handle its increasing case load and sanctions will be imposed for failure to follow the Rules as provided

6

in both the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Local Rules of Practice for the Eastern District of

7

California.

8

XIV.

9

Effect of this Order
The foregoing order represents the best estimate of the court and counsel as to the agenda most

10

suitable to dispose of this case. The trial date reserved is specifically reserved for this case. If the

11

parties determine at any time that the schedule outlined in this order cannot be met, counsel are ordered

12

to notify the court immediately of that fact so that adjustments may be made, either by stipulation or by

13

subsequent status conference.

14

The dates set in this Order are considered to be firm and will not be modified absent a

15

showing of good cause even if the request to modify is made by stipulation. Stipulations

16

extending the deadlines contained herein will not be considered unless they are accompanied by

17

affidavits or declarations, and where appropriate attached exhibits, which establish good cause

18

for granting the relief requested.

19

Failure to comply with this order may result in the imposition of sanctions.

20
21
22
23

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

December 16, 2014

/s/ Jennifer L. Thurston
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

24
25
26
27
28
6