Moore v. Singh et al

Filing 10

SECOND STIPULATION and ORDER for Extension of Time for Kanawal Preet Singh, aka Anwalp Singh, individually and dba Stop N Shop Liquor #1 aka K & A Liquor and Surjit Singh, individually and dba Stop N Shop Liquor #1 aka K & A Liquor to Respond to Complaint signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 11/21/2014. (Martinez, A)

1
2
3
4
5
6

Bruce A. Neilson #096952
7108 N. Fresno St. #410
Fresno, California 93720
Telephone [phone]
Facsimile [phone]
Attorney for Defendants
Kanawal Preet Singh and Surjit Singh,
both individually and dba Stop N Shop
Liquor #1 aka K & A Liquor
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

8

*****

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

RONALD MOORE,
Plaintiff,
vs.
KANAWAL PREET SINGH, aka ANWALP
SINGH, individually and dba STOP N SHOP
LIQUOR #1 aka K & A LIQUOR; SURJIT
SINGH, individually and dba STOP N SHOP
LIQUOR #1 aka K & A LIQUOR;
DEFENDANTS.
_____________________________________

CASE NO. 1:14-cv-01364-AWI-GSA
SECOND STIPULATION AND
PROPOSED ORDER FOR EXTENSION
OF TIME FOR KANAWAL PREET
SINGH, aka ANWALP SINGH,
individually and dba STOP N SHOP
LIQUOR #1 aka K & A LIQUOR and
SURJIT SINGH, individually and dba
STOP N SHOP LIQUOR #1 aka K & A
LIQUOR TO RESPOND TO
COMPLAINT; ORDER THEREON

18

WHEREAS:
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

1.

Plaintiff Ronald Moore filed this action on August 29, 2014.

2.

This is the second request for an extension of time for Defendants KANAWAL PREET

SINGH, aka ANWALP SINGH, individually and dba STOP N SHOP LIQUOR #1 aka K & A
LIQUOR nnd SURJIT SINGH, individually and dba STOP N SHOP LIQUOR #1 aka K & A
LIQUOR (collectively referred to "Defendants"). A previous extension of time was granted by the
plaintiff within the statutory allowance; thus, court approval is required for a further extension of time.
3.

Plaintiff and Defendants are in settlement negotiations at this time.

4.

Plaintiff has presented to Defendants a proposed settlement agreement for Defendants to

review to settle this case. Additional time is needed by Defendants to determine feasibility.
Moore v. Kanawal Preet Singh et al.; Case no.14-cv-01364
Stipulation to Extend Time; Order Thereon
1

1

5.

The parties agree that settlement of this case would save valuable court time and resources.

2

6.

The parties have agreed to extend Defendants' time to respond to the complaint until December

3

3, 2014, subject to the court's approval, and believe that the case can be settled within that time.

4

7.

5

mandatory scheduling conference.

6

This extension of time will not alter any date or event already set by Court order, including the

NOW THEREFORE, Defendants through their attorneys, and Plaintiff Ronald Moore, through

7

his attorneys, hereby stipulate and agree that the time for Defendants KANAWAL PREET SINGH,

8

aka ANWALP SINGH, individually and dba STOP N SHOP LIQUOR #1 aka K & A LIQUOR nnd

9

SURJIT SINGH, individually and dba STOP N SHOP LIQUOR #1 aka K & A LIQUOR to answer or

10
11
12

otherwise respond to the Complaint shall be extended up to and including December 3, 2014, pending
court approval.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.

13
14

Dated: November 17, 2014

MOORE LAW FIRM, PC
/s/Tanya Moore
Tanya Moore, Attorney for Plaintiff Ronald Moore

15
16

Dated: November 17, 2014

/s/Bruce A. Neilson
Bruce A. Neilson, Attorney for Defendants

17

Kanawal Preet Singh and Surjit Singh, both individually and
dba Stop N Shop Liquor #1 aka K & A Liquor

18

ORDER

19
20
21

Based on the foregoing stipulation, Defendants are granted an extension of time up to and
including December 3, 2014, to respond to the complaint.

22
23

IT IS SO ORDERED.

24

Dated:
25

November 21, 2014

/s/ Gary S. Austin
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

26
27
28
Moore v. Kanawal Preet Singh et al.; Case no.14-cv-01364
Stipulation to Extend Time; Order Thereon

2