Board of Trustees Of The United Food And Commercial Workers National Health And Welfare Fund v. Gibson Wine Company

Filing 27

STIPULATION to Continue Mandatory Scheduling Conference; ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 2/10/2015. Initial Scheduling Conference currently set for 2/17/2015 is CONTINUED to 3/19/2015 at 10:30 AM in Courtroom 10 (GSA) before Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin. (Martinez, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 Henry Y. Chiu, #222927 Tucker, Chiu, Hebesha & Ward PC 642 Pollasky Avenue, Suite 230 Clovis, California 93612 Telephone: (559) 472-9922 Facsimile: (559) 472-9892 4 Attorneys for Plaintiff 5 6 7 8 9 Justin T. Campagne, #211825 Wiley R. Driskill, #253913 Campagne, Campagne & Lerner A Professional Corporation Airport Office Center 1685 North Helm Avenue Fresno, California 93727 Telephone: (559) 255-1637 Facsimile: (559) 252-9617 10 Attorneys for Defendant Gibson Wine Company 11 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 13 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE UNITED FOOD AND COMMERCIAL WORKERS NATIONAL HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND, ) Case No. 1:14-CV-01366-AWI-GSA ) ) STIPULATION TO CONTINUE ) MANDATORY SCHEDULING ) CONFERENCE; ORDER Plaintiff, ) ) Currently Set Date: February 17, 2015 v. ) Currently Set Time: 10:00 a.m. ) Courtroom: 10 (Hon. Mag. Judge Austin) GIBSON WINE COMPANY, and DOES 1 ) through 50, ) ) Defendants. ) ) 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION TO CONTINUE MANDATORY SCHEDULING CONFERENCE; [PROPOSED] ORDER 1 WHEREAS, Plaintiff Board of Trustees of the United Food and 2 Commercial Workers National Health and Welfare Fund (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant 3 Gibson Wine Company (“Defendant,” and together with Plaintiff, “the Parties”) stipulated 4 to service wherein Defendant’s response to the Complaint was due on or before January 5 29, 2015; 6 WHEREAS, the Defendant has filed a Petition to Compel Arbitration, 7 which is currently scheduled to be heard by the Honorable Judge Ishii at 1:30 p.m. on 8 March 2, 2015; 9 WHEREAS, the Mandatory Scheduling Conference is currently set before 10 the Honorable Magistrate Judge Austin for 10:00 a.m. on February 17, 2015, and the 11 Mandatory Joint Scheduling Conference Statement must therefore be filed on or before 12 February 10, 2015; 13 14 WHEREAS, due to the aforementioned time to respond and the filing of the Defendant’s Petition, the Defendant has not yet filed an answer to the complaint; 15 WHEREAS, the parties intend to engage in meaningful settlement 16 negotiations, which may soon also include early mediation and/or settlement conference, 17 and wish to avoid incurring additional fees and unnecessarily utilizing judicial resources 18 while they explore, and hopefully finalize, a settlement; 19 20 NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties, by and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate as follows: 21 1. That the Mandatory Scheduling Conference currently set for 22 February 17, 2015 be continued to a date on or after March 17, 2015, at the Court’s 23 convenience. 24 Dated: February 10, 2015 Campagne, Campagne & Lerner A Professional Corporation 25 26 27 By /s/ Wiley R. Driskill Wiley R. Driskill Attorneys for Defendant Gibson Wine Co. 28 STIPULATION TO CONTINUE MANDATORY SCHEDULING CONFERENCE; [PROPOSED] ORDER Page 1 1 Dated: February 10, 2015 Tucker, Chiu, Hebesha & Ward PC 2 By /s/ Henry Y. Chiu Henry Y. Chiu Attorneys for Plaintiff Board of Trustees, UFCW National Health and Welfare Fund 3 4 5 6 ORDER 7 The Parties having so stipulated and good cause appearing, 8 IT IS ORDERED that the Mandatory Scheduling Conference currently set 9 for February 17, 2015, is continued to March 19, 2015, in Courtroom 10 at 10:30 a.m. The 10 Scheduling Conference Statement is to be filed no more than seven (7) days prior to the 11 date of the conference. 12 13 14 15 16 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: February 10, 2015 /s/ Gary S. Austin UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION TO CONTINUE MANDATORY SCHEDULING CONFERENCE; [PROPOSED] ORDER Page 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?