Trujillo v. Biter
Filing
25
ORDER Denying Plaintiff's 22 Motion for the Denial of Plaintiff's Due Process Rights, signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 11/7/16. (Gonzalez, R)
1
2
3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
4
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
5
6
7
GUILLERMO CRUZ TRUJILLO,
Plaintiff,
8
9
10
v.
1:14-cv-01370-EPG (PC)
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION FOR THE DENIAL OF
PLAINTIFF’S DUE PROCESS RIGHTS
(ECF NO. 22)
BITER, et al.,
Defendants.
11
12
Guillermo Trujillo ("Plaintiff") is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma
13
pauperis with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The case is now proceeding
14
on Plaintiff’s Third Amended Complaint. (ECF No. 17).
15
On October 28, 2016, Plaintiff filed a motion for the denial of [Plaintiff’s] due process
16
rights (“the Motion”). (ECF No. 22). According to Plaintiff, a prison official was preventing
17
Plaintiff from making copies. This allegedly prevented Plaintiff from following the Court’s
18
order (ECF No. 21) requiring Plaintiff to provide the Court with four copies of the Third
19
Amended Complaint.
20
The Court notes that on October 31, 2016, the appropriate service documents were sent
21
to the United States Marshal for service, including four copies of the Third Amended
22
Complaint. (ECF Nos. 23 & 24). Therefore, the Motion will be denied as moot.
23
24
25
26
Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED Plaintiff’s motion
for
the
denial
of
[Plaintiff’s] due process rights is DENIED as moot.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
November 7, 2016
/s/
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
27
28
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?