Trujillo v. Biter

Filing 95

ORDER DENYING Plaintiff's Motion Regarding Findings and Recommendations 93 , signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 2/15/2018: 21-Day Deadline. (Hellings, J)

1
2
3
4
5
6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

8
9

Case No. 1:14-cv-01370-LJO-EPG (PC)

GUILLERMO CRUZ TRUJILLO,

10

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION
REGARDING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS

Plaintiff,

11

v.

12

GOMEZ, et al.,

13

(ECF NO. 93)

Defendants.

14
15
16

Guillermo Cruz Trujillo (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma

17

pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On February 12, 2018,

18

Plaintiff filed a motion regarding findings and recommendations. (ECF No. 93).

19

It is not clear what relief Plaintiff is seeking in this motion. Plaintiff appears to be

20

arguing that the Court erred in granting his extension of time to file his objections to the

21

findings and recommendations that were issued on December 26, 2017, because he had already

22

filed his objections by the time the extension was granted.

23

However, the Court has not received Plaintiff’s objections to the findings and

24

recommendations that were issued on December 26, 2017 (ECF No. 89). Therefore, Plaintiff’s

25

motion will be denied, but the Court will grant Plaintiff twenty-one days to file (or re-file)

26

objections to the findings and recommendations.

27

Accordingly, Plaintiff’s motion regarding findings and recommendations is DENIED.

28

Plaintiff has twenty-one days from the date of service of this order to file objections to the
1

1

findings and recommendations issued on December 26, 2017.

2
3
4

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

February 15, 2018

/s/
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2