Center for Biological Diversity, et al. v. Skalski, et al.
Filing
62
ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 9/24/14 re: 45 , 56 . In light of the referenced stipulations, each Proposed Intervenor's Motion to Intervene is GRANTED. (Meuleman, A)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
8
9
CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL
DIVERSITY, EARTH ISLAND
INSTITUTE, and CALIFORNIA
CHAPPARAL INSTITUTE,
12
13
14
15
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO
INTERVENE
Plaintiffs,
10
11
No. 1:14-cv-01382-GEB-GSA
v.
SUSAN SKALSKI, in her
official capacity as Forest
Supervisor for the Stanislaus
National Forest; and UNITED
STATES FOREST SERVICE, an
agency of the Department of
Agriculture,
Defendants.
16
17
18
Tuolumne
American
Sierra
21
California Farm Bureau Federation (“Proposed Intervenors”) move
22
to intervene in this action as Defendant-Intervenors either as of
23
right under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (“Rule”) 24(a) or
24
permissively
25
Intervene (“Mot.”), ECF No. 9.)
under
Plaintiffs
Rule
Yosemite
24(b).
stipulate
Stanislaus
(Mem.
to
Crook,
Council,
20
Industries,
William
Resource
California
Pacific
Association,
Forest
19
26
Forestry
County,
the
in
Mary
Crook,
Solutions,
Supp.
of
intervention
Mot.
of
and
to
each
27
Proposed Intervenor; Defendants stipulate to the intervention of
28
Proposed Intervenors Tuolumne County, American Forest Resource
1
1
Council,
2
Industries; and Defendants “take no position” on the intervention
3
of William Crook, Mary Crook, California Farm Bureau Federation,
4
and
5
Regarding Intervention 2:9-14, Sept. 16, 2014, ECF No. 45; Defs.’
6
Response
7
Intervention 2:13-15, September 22, 2014, ECF No. 56.)
Yosemite
8
9
10
California
to
Forestry
Stanislaus
Mot.
1:7,
Association,
Solutions.
ECF
No.
(Mot.
46;
and
Sierra
1:6;
Stipulation
Pacific
Stipulation
Regarding
In light of the referenced stipulations, each Proposed
Intervenor’s Motion to Intervene is GRANTED.
Dated:
September 24, 2014
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?