Denegal v. Brazelton et al

Filing 38

ORDER DISMISSING Action with Prejudice and CLOSING CASE signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 4/4/2016. CASE CLOSED. (Sant Agata, S)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

KEITH DARNELL DENEGAL,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14

No. 1:14-cv-01410-DAD-SAB (PC)

v.

ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITH
PREJUDICE AND CLOSING CASE

P. D. BRAZELTON,
(Doc. No. 37)

15

Defendant.

16
Plaintiff Keith Darnell Denegal is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil

17
18

rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On April 1, 2016, the parties submitted a stipulation

19

to dismiss the instant action with prejudice, with each party to bear its own costs and attorney’s

20

fees, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). (Doc. No. 37.) In light of the

21

parties’ stipulation, this case has been terminated, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); Wilson v.

22

City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997), and is hereby dismissed with prejudice and

23

without an award of attorneys’ fees and costs to either party. Accordingly, the court directs the

24

Clerk of Court to close the case.

25

IT IS SO ORDERED.

26

Dated:

April 4, 2016
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

27
28
1