Valson v. Kelso et al

Filing 51

ORDER directing service of subpoena by the United States Marshals, service without prepayment of costs signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 9/4/2018. Case Management Deadline: 9/25/2018.(Lundstrom, T)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 11 SILUS M. VALSON, Plaintiff, 12 13 14 15 v. Case No. 1:14-cv-01420-DAD-EPG (PC) ORDER DIRECTING SERVICE OF SUBPOENA BY THE UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE WITHOUT PREPAYMENT OF COSTS MATTHEW CATE and MARTIN BITER, Defendants. 16 17 18 The Court previously granted Plaintiff’s motion for the issuance of a subpoena upon the 19 United States Environmental Protection Agency. (ECF No. 49). Plaintiff has now completed 20 and returned the subpoena and form USM-285. 21 Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that: 22 1. The Clerk of the Court shall forward the following documents to the United States 23 Marshals Service: 24 a. One (1) completed and issued subpoena duces tecum; 25 b. One (1) completed USM-285 form; and 26 c. Two (2) copies of this order, one to accompany the subpoena and one for the 27 28 United States Marshals Service. 2. The Clerk of Court is directed to attach a copy of the completed subpoena duces 1 1 tecum to this order. 2 3. Within TWENTY (20) DAYS from the date of this order, the United States 3 Marshals Service SHALL effect personal service of the subpoena, along with a copy 4 of this order, upon the entity named in the subpoena pursuant to Rule 45 of the 5 Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and 28 U.S.C. § 566(c). 6 4. The United States Marshals Service is DIRECTED to retain a copy of the subpoena 7 8 in its file for future use. 5. Within TEN (10) DAYS after personal service is effected, the United States 9 Marshals Service SHALL file the return of service. 10 11 12 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: September 4, 2018 /s/ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?