Valson v. Kelso et al
Filing
51
ORDER directing service of subpoena by the United States Marshals, service without prepayment of costs signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 9/4/2018. Case Management Deadline: 9/25/2018.(Lundstrom, T)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
11
SILUS M. VALSON,
Plaintiff,
12
13
14
15
v.
Case No. 1:14-cv-01420-DAD-EPG (PC)
ORDER DIRECTING SERVICE OF
SUBPOENA BY THE UNITED STATES
MARSHALS SERVICE WITHOUT
PREPAYMENT OF COSTS
MATTHEW CATE and MARTIN
BITER,
Defendants.
16
17
18
The Court previously granted Plaintiff’s motion for the issuance of a subpoena upon the
19
United States Environmental Protection Agency. (ECF No. 49). Plaintiff has now completed
20
and returned the subpoena and form USM-285.
21
Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that:
22
1. The Clerk of the Court shall forward the following documents to the United States
23
Marshals Service:
24
a. One (1) completed and issued subpoena duces tecum;
25
b. One (1) completed USM-285 form; and
26
c. Two (2) copies of this order, one to accompany the subpoena and one for the
27
28
United States Marshals Service.
2. The Clerk of Court is directed to attach a copy of the completed subpoena duces
1
1
tecum to this order.
2
3. Within TWENTY (20) DAYS from the date of this order, the United States
3
Marshals Service SHALL effect personal service of the subpoena, along with a copy
4
of this order, upon the entity named in the subpoena pursuant to Rule 45 of the
5
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and 28 U.S.C. § 566(c).
6
4. The United States Marshals Service is DIRECTED to retain a copy of the subpoena
7
8
in its file for future use.
5. Within TEN (10) DAYS after personal service is effected, the United States
9
Marshals Service SHALL file the return of service.
10
11
12
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
September 4, 2018
/s/
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?