Valson v. Kelso et al
Filing
66
ORDER Following Status Conference, signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 11/1/18. Jury Trial set for 12/17/2019 at 01:00 PM in Courtroom 5 (DAD) before District Judge Dale A. Drozd. Trial Confirmation Hearing set for 10/21/2019 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 5 (DAD) before District Judge Dale A. Drozd. (Gonzalez, R)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
SILUS M. VALSON,
10
11
12
13
Case No. 1:14-cv-01420-DAD-EPG (PC)
Plaintiff,
ORDER FOLLOWING STATUS
CONFERENCE
v.
(ECF NO. 61)
MATTHEW CATE and MARTIN BITER,
Defendants.
14
15
16
Silus Valson (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in
this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
17
The Court held a telephonic discovery and status conference on October 31, 2018.
18
Plaintiff appeared on behalf of himself and counsel Tyler Heath and Adriano Hrvatin appeared
19
on behalf of Defendants.
20
For the reasons stated on the record at the conference, IT IS ORDERED that:
21
1. The order to show cause issued on October 16, 2018 (ECF No. 61), is
22
DISCHARGED.
23
2. Defendants have until November 12, 2018, to file any supplement to their motion
24
for judgment on the pleadings, including a supplement to their request for judicial
25
notice.
26
3. Defendants have until November 19, 2018, to file a response to Plaintiff’s requests
27
for judicial notice (ECF Nos. 37; 38; 39, pgs. 29-33; & 41). Plaintiff has until
28
1
1
November 26, 2018, to file a reply.
2
4. Counsel Tyler Heath shall contact Plaintiff to meet and confer regarding whether a
3
settlement conference would be beneficial, and if so, when it should be held. No
4
later than November 19, 2018, Mr. Heath shall inform the Court via email
5
(mrooney@caed.uscourts.gov) whether the parties want a settlement conference to
6
be set, and if so, provide potential dates. Additionally, Mr. Heath shall mail a copy
7
of the email to Plaintiff.
8
9
5. The deadline for Defendants to file an opposition to Plaintiff’s motion for summary
judgment and a cross-motion for summary judgment is January 18, 2019.
10
6. The deadline for Plaintiff to reply to Defendants’ opposition to his motion for
11
summary judgment and respond to Defendants’ cross-motion for summary
12
judgment is February 8, 2019.
13
7. The Telephonic Trial Confirmation Hearing is set for October 21, 2019, at 1:30
14
p.m., in Courtroom 5, before District Judge Dale A. Drozd.
15
telephonically, the parties must dial into the conference at 877-402-9757, using
16
access code 6966236, at the time of the hearing. Counsel for Defendants is required
17
to arrange for the participation of Plaintiff in the Telephonic Trial Confirmation
18
Hearing.
19
conference line, please wait to state your appearance until your case has been called
20
and appearances are requested. Keep all background noise to a minimum.
To participate
Because the Court may be hearing other matters using the same
21
8. The deadline for the parties to file motions for the attendance of incarcerated
22
witnesses is August 21, 2019. Oppositions, if any, must be filed on or before
23
September 20, 2019.
24
9. If Plaintiff wishes to have the Marshals Service serve any unincarcerated witnesses
25
who refuse to testify voluntarily, Plaintiff must submit the money orders to the
26
Court no later than September 20, 2019. In order to ensure timely submission of the
27
money orders, Plaintiff must notify the Court of the names and locations of his
28
witnesses no later than August 21, 2019.
2
1
10. Plaintiff shall file and serve a pretrial statement on or before August 21, 2019.
2
Defendants shall file and serve a pretrial statement on or before September 20,
3
2019.
4
11. The Trial is set for December 17, 2019, at 1:00 p.m., in Courtroom 5, before District
5
6
Judge Dale A. Drozd.
12. All other deadlines remain the same.
7
8
9
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
November 1, 2018
/s/
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?