Rivera v. Borden
Filing
25
ORDER DISMISSING Action for Failure to Prosecute, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 1/4/16: This action is dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. The Clerk is directed to close this case. (CASE CLOSED)(Hellings, J)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
JOSEPH MANUEL RIVERA,
11
Case No. 1:14-cv-01423-SAB-PC
Plaintiff,
12
ORDER DISMISSING ACTION FOR
FAILURE TO PROSECUTE
v.
13
OFFICER BORDEN,
14
Defendant.
15
16
Plaintiff Rivera a former Stanislaus County Jail inmate appearing pro se and in forma
17
18 pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
Plaintiff has consented to
1
19 magistrate judge jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).
On September 23, 2015, an order sent to Plaintiff at his address of record was returned by
20
21 the U.S. Postal Service as undeliverable. Local Rule 183(b) requires a pro se Plaintiff to keep
22 the court advised of his address of record. A failure to follow the Local Rules is a ground for
23 dismissal. An order to show cause was entered on November 30, 2015, directing Plaintiff to
24 show cause why this action should not be dismissed for his failure to comply with the Local
25 Rules. (ECF No. 24.) Plaintiff was specifically cautioned that his failure to file a response would
26 result in dismissal of this action pursuant to Local Rule 110. Plaintiff has not filed a response to
27 the November 30, 2015, order to show cause.
28
1
Plaintiff filed a consent to proceed before a magistrate judge on October 8, 2014. (ECF No. 4.)
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is dismissed for failure to state
1
2 a claim upon which relief could be granted. The Clerk is directed to close this case.
3
4
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
6 Dated:
January 4, 2016
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?