Rivera v. Borden

Filing 25

ORDER DISMISSING Action for Failure to Prosecute, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 1/4/16: This action is dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. The Clerk is directed to close this case. (CASE CLOSED)(Hellings, J)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOSEPH MANUEL RIVERA, 11 Case No. 1:14-cv-01423-SAB-PC Plaintiff, 12 ORDER DISMISSING ACTION FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE v. 13 OFFICER BORDEN, 14 Defendant. 15 16 Plaintiff Rivera a former Stanislaus County Jail inmate appearing pro se and in forma 17 18 pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff has consented to 1 19 magistrate judge jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). On September 23, 2015, an order sent to Plaintiff at his address of record was returned by 20 21 the U.S. Postal Service as undeliverable. Local Rule 183(b) requires a pro se Plaintiff to keep 22 the court advised of his address of record. A failure to follow the Local Rules is a ground for 23 dismissal. An order to show cause was entered on November 30, 2015, directing Plaintiff to 24 show cause why this action should not be dismissed for his failure to comply with the Local 25 Rules. (ECF No. 24.) Plaintiff was specifically cautioned that his failure to file a response would 26 result in dismissal of this action pursuant to Local Rule 110. Plaintiff has not filed a response to 27 the November 30, 2015, order to show cause. 28 1 Plaintiff filed a consent to proceed before a magistrate judge on October 8, 2014. (ECF No. 4.) 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is dismissed for failure to state 1 2 a claim upon which relief could be granted. The Clerk is directed to close this case. 3 4 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 Dated: January 4, 2016 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?