Klein v. Gravance

Filing 23

ORDER to SHOW CAUSE why action should not be dismissed for failure to follow Court Order signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 11/4/2015. Show Cause Response due by 12/7/2015.(Lundstrom, T)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MICHAEL KLEIN, 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 C. GRAVANCE, et al., 15 Case No. 1:14-cv-01431 DLB PC ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ACTION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO FOLLOW COURT ORDER THIRTY-DAY RESPONSE DEADLINE Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Michael Klein (“Plaintiff”) is a former prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma 17 18 pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.1 On September 22, 2015, the Court ordered Plaintiff to return service documents within thirty 19 20 (30) days of the date of service of the order. Over thirty (30) days have passed and Plaintiff has 21 failed to comply with the order. Accordingly, Plaintiff is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE, if any he has, why he failed to 22 23 comply with the Court’s September 22, 2015, order. Plaintiff must file a response to this order 24 within thirty (30) days of the date of service. Plaintiff may also comply with this order by returning 25 service documents. 26 /// 27 /// 28 1 Plaintiff consented to the jurisdiction of the United States Magistrate Judge on September 25, 2014. 1 1 Failure to comply with this order will result in dismissal of this action. 2 3 4 5 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: /s/ Dennis November 4, 2015 L. Beck UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?