Shaw v. McCorduck Properties Los Banos, LLC, et al.
Filing
24
STIPULATION and ORDER DISMISSING CASE signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 01/06/2015. CASE CLOSED.(Flores, E)
1
2
3
4
5
6
Tanya E. Moore, SBN 206683
MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C.
332 North Second Street
San Jose, California 95112
Telephone (408) 298-2000
Facsimile (408) 298-6046
Email: tanya@moorelawfirm.com
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Cecil Shaw
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
CECIL SHAW,
12
13
14
15
Plaintiff,
vs.
MCCORDUCK PROPERTIES LOS
BANOS, LLC, a California limited liability
company, et al.,
16
17
18
Defendants.
) No. 1:14-cv-01444-LJO-SAB
)
) STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF
) ACTION; ORDER
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF ACTION; ORDER
Page 1
1
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff Cecil Shaw and Defendants
2
McCorduck Properties Los Banos, LLC, a California limited liability company, and Sy Liang
3
Wang dba Teriyaki House, the parties remaining in this action, by and through their respective
4
counsel, that pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), the above-captioned
5
action be dismissed with prejudice in its entirety. The parties are to bear their own respective
6
fees, costs, and expenses.
7
8
9
Date: January 5, 2015
MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C.
10
/s/ Tanya E. Moore
Tanya E. Moore
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Cecil Shaw
11
12
13
CALL & JENSEN
14
15
/s/ Ryan M. McNamara
Ryan M. McNamara
Attorneys for Defendants
McCorduck Properties Los Banos, LLC, a
California limited liability company, and Sy Liang
Wang dba Teriyaki House
16
17
18
19
ORDER
20
21
The parties having so stipulated,
22
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action be dismissed with prejudice in its entirety.
23
24
25
SO ORDERED
Dated: January 6, 2015
/s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill
United States District Judge
26
27
28
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF ACTION; ORDER
Page 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?