Shaw v. McCorduck Properties Los Banos, LLC, et al.

Filing 24

STIPULATION and ORDER DISMISSING CASE signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 01/06/2015. CASE CLOSED.(Flores, E)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 Tanya E. Moore, SBN 206683 MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C. 332 North Second Street San Jose, California 95112 Telephone (408) 298-2000 Facsimile (408) 298-6046 Email: tanya@moorelawfirm.com Attorneys for Plaintiff Cecil Shaw 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CECIL SHAW, 12 13 14 15 Plaintiff, vs. MCCORDUCK PROPERTIES LOS BANOS, LLC, a California limited liability company, et al., 16 17 18 Defendants. ) No. 1:14-cv-01444-LJO-SAB ) ) STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF ) ACTION; ORDER ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF ACTION; ORDER Page 1 1 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff Cecil Shaw and Defendants 2 McCorduck Properties Los Banos, LLC, a California limited liability company, and Sy Liang 3 Wang dba Teriyaki House, the parties remaining in this action, by and through their respective 4 counsel, that pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), the above-captioned 5 action be dismissed with prejudice in its entirety. The parties are to bear their own respective 6 fees, costs, and expenses. 7 8 9 Date: January 5, 2015 MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C. 10 /s/ Tanya E. Moore Tanya E. Moore Attorneys for Plaintiff Cecil Shaw 11 12 13 CALL & JENSEN 14 15 /s/ Ryan M. McNamara Ryan M. McNamara Attorneys for Defendants McCorduck Properties Los Banos, LLC, a California limited liability company, and Sy Liang Wang dba Teriyaki House 16 17 18 19 ORDER 20 21 The parties having so stipulated, 22 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action be dismissed with prejudice in its entirety. 23 24 25 SO ORDERED Dated: January 6, 2015 /s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill United States District Judge 26 27 28 STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF ACTION; ORDER Page 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?