Fourstar v. Copenhaver
Filing
47
ORDER Denying Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment re 44 , signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 7/26/16. (Gonzalez, R)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
VICTOR CHARLES FOURSTAR, JR.,
Petitioner,
10
PAUL COPENHAVER, Warden,
Respondent.
13
14
15
ORDER DENYING MOTION
TO ALTER OR AMEND JUDGMENT
v.
11
12
No. 1:14-cv-01456-SKO HC
(Doc. 44)
Petitioner Victor Charles Fourstar, Jr., is a federal prisoner whose petition for writ of
habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 was denied on June 30, 2016.1 Petitioner moves,
16
17
pursuant to F.R.Civ.P. 59(e), to alter or amend the judgment denying the petition to a dismissal
18
without prejudice that will permit him to continue to pursue his claims. Petitioner contends the
19
Supreme Court’s recent decision in Williams v. Pennsylvania, 136 S.Ct. 1899 (2016), establishes
20
a new basis for habeas relief.
21
22
The Williams holding has no application to the petition in the above-captioned matter,
which addressed various disciplinary actions against Petitioner during his confinement. The issue
23
24
25
26
addressed in Williams was whether recusal was required of a State Supreme Court judge who,
while he was a District Attorney, had authorized bringing capital charges against Williams.
Petitioner’s argument is based on the Montana District Court proceedings that led to his
27
1
28
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c)(1), both parties consented, in writing, to the jurisdiction of a United States
Magistrate Judge to conduct all further proceedings in this case, including the entry of final judgment.
1
1
conviction and sentencing to federal prison, not to any of the disciplinary proceedings addressed
2
in this action.
3
Based on the foregoing, Petitioner’s motion to alter or amend the judgment pursuant to
4
F.R.Civ.P. 59(e) is hereby DENIED.
5
6
7
IT IS SO ORDERED.
8
Dated:
July 26, 2016
/s/
Sheila K. Oberto
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?